2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foliar contamination of Phaseolus vulgaris with aerosols of 137Cs, 85Sr, 133Ba and 123mTe: influence of plant development stage upon contamination and rain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(61 reference statements)
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparable experiment, Chadwick and Chamberlain (1970), found the interception of grass to be in a similar range ( 85 Sr: 0.20-0.82), as in the presented study ( 134 Cs: >0.01-0.76; 85 Sr: >0.01-0.80). Similarly, Eriksson et al (1998) and Madoz-Escande et al (2004) found in a comparable experiment on leys and common beans that the highest f for 134 Cs (0.71, ours: 0.76) and for 85 Sr (1.11, ours: 0.80) is 24 h after deposition, with f increasing with the biomass.…”
Section: Calculations Of Interception and Transfersupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a comparable experiment, Chadwick and Chamberlain (1970), found the interception of grass to be in a similar range ( 85 Sr: 0.20-0.82), as in the presented study ( 134 Cs: >0.01-0.76; 85 Sr: >0.01-0.80). Similarly, Eriksson et al (1998) and Madoz-Escande et al (2004) found in a comparable experiment on leys and common beans that the highest f for 134 Cs (0.71, ours: 0.76) and for 85 Sr (1.11, ours: 0.80) is 24 h after deposition, with f increasing with the biomass.…”
Section: Calculations Of Interception and Transfersupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One of the most important pathway for the transfer of radionuclides, 90 Sr and 137 Cs, to humans is through milk and meat consumption of animals that feed on contaminated fodder from ley and pasture (Fasenko et al, 2009;Gastberger et al, 2001;UNSCEAR, 2008). Milk obtained from contaminated agricultural fodder is a main source of the total collective dose to humans (Lepicard and Dubreuil, 2001;Madoz-Escande et al, 2004;Middleton, 1958). The levels of milk contamination by radionuclides depends on, among others, the foliar absorption by plant leaves and shoots, the root uptake of radionuclides from soil to crops, the consumption of contaminated soil by animals and the transfer of radionuclides from forage vegetation to milk (Gastberger et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this conceptual model, the foliage was separated into two different compartments, in which the 2 specific processes took place: a mechanical (wash off) and a physiological (absorption) behaviour [3]. These two processes occurred at the time of the rain event only.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…radiocaesium and radiostrontium, are taken up by the vegetation directly through leaves. There is limited information on the direct uptake rate of radionuclides and as well the rate of intercepted radionuclides by plants, directly after the occurrence of wet deposition in a growing crop [3]. The level of interception by plant parts depends on climate conditions like precipitation, wind speed, physico-chemical form of the radionuclides, plant morphology and biomass density [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information on the direct uptake rate of radionuclides and as well the rate of intercepted radionuclides by plants, directly after the occurrence of wet deposition in a growing crop [3]. The level of interception by plant parts depends on climate conditions like precipitation, wind speed, physico-chemical form of the radionuclides, plant morphology and biomass density [3][4][5]. The proportion of precipitation that can be held by the plant canopy is quickly declining after that the maximum holding capacity of leaves have been reached, which is related to the amount and intensity of the precipitation as well as the plant morphology i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%