2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-011-9267-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foliar herbivory and leaf traits of five native tree species in a young plantation of Central Panama

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf damage in tropical forests ranged from 11% for shade tolerant to 14% for tropical dry forest trees in a meta-study comprising many different tree species (Coley and Barone 1996), and in savannas from 15 to nearly 0% across 25 adult-size tree species in Brazil (Marquis et al 2001) and from 9 to 3% across 9 tree species from the sapling-stage size class in Ivory Coast (Unsicker and Mody 2005). Previous studies reporting herbivore damage specifically for T. rosea grown in Panamanian plantations may have underestimated herbivory, with 3% leaf damage in 1-yearold monocultures (Paul et al 2011) and 9% in unprotected 2-year-old mixed stands (Plath et al 2011b). Both studies quantified damage earlier in the season than the current study, which is the first to assess the key herbivores and their temporal abundance patterns (see Electronic Supplementary Material 2 for temporal abundance patterns).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Leaf damage in tropical forests ranged from 11% for shade tolerant to 14% for tropical dry forest trees in a meta-study comprising many different tree species (Coley and Barone 1996), and in savannas from 15 to nearly 0% across 25 adult-size tree species in Brazil (Marquis et al 2001) and from 9 to 3% across 9 tree species from the sapling-stage size class in Ivory Coast (Unsicker and Mody 2005). Previous studies reporting herbivore damage specifically for T. rosea grown in Panamanian plantations may have underestimated herbivory, with 3% leaf damage in 1-yearold monocultures (Paul et al 2011) and 9% in unprotected 2-year-old mixed stands (Plath et al 2011b). Both studies quantified damage earlier in the season than the current study, which is the first to assess the key herbivores and their temporal abundance patterns (see Electronic Supplementary Material 2 for temporal abundance patterns).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This preferential exploration of the effects of miners on leaf abscission can be classified as a research bias because in natural ecosystems, the average background damage imposed by defoliators is more than 10 times as high as the damage caused by miners (Nuckols & Connor ; Paul et al . ). In our opinion, this bias can be explained in two ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The majority of studies on the effects of natural herbivory on leaf life span have been conducted with leaf miners: these insects account for 65% of the guild-specific data in our meta-analysis, compared with 12% on defoliators. This preferential exploration of the effects of miners on leaf abscission can be classified as a research bias because in natural ecosystems, the average background damage imposed by defoliators is more than 10 times as high as the damage caused by miners (Nuckols & Connor 1995;Paul et al 2012). In our opinion, this bias can be explained in two ways.…”
Section: A R I a T I O N I N T H E E F F E C T S O F I N S E C T H mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the moment of the excavation, (2008) and Paul et al (2012) trees were ten years old (DBH ranged between 10.1 to 19.8 cm in the plantation depending on the species). Soil particles were removed while leaving the roots intact to determine root orders for each species based on the classification proposed by Pregitzer et al (2002).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%