2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1642-431x(12)60076-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follicular populations, recruitment and atresia in the ovaries of different strains of mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Pepling et al, different numbers of follicles in mouse ovaries could be due to methods used to assess their number, leading to differences between animals of the same age and genetic strain [ 73 ]. More recently, differences in primordial follicle population among different mice strains was demonstrated to be attenuated by different patterns of follicular recruitment and atresia [ 74 ]. Nevertheless, in our study, each experiment was performed with its own mice strain control and altogether the efficiency of inhibitors such as LY294002 and rapamycin was confirmed to limit follicular activation either by in vitro analysis of signalling pathways or by immunohistochemistry and follicular counting both in mature and juvenile ovaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pepling et al, different numbers of follicles in mouse ovaries could be due to methods used to assess their number, leading to differences between animals of the same age and genetic strain [ 73 ]. More recently, differences in primordial follicle population among different mice strains was demonstrated to be attenuated by different patterns of follicular recruitment and atresia [ 74 ]. Nevertheless, in our study, each experiment was performed with its own mice strain control and altogether the efficiency of inhibitors such as LY294002 and rapamycin was confirmed to limit follicular activation either by in vitro analysis of signalling pathways or by immunohistochemistry and follicular counting both in mature and juvenile ovaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded grafts were serially sliced (5 μm) for a total of 40 sections per graft. The slices were stained with hematoxylin/eosin and were qualitatively examined for the presence of ovarian follicles (primordial, primary, secondary, antral, and atretic), which were classified as previously described [ 19 ]. Additionally, the volume densities of the graft histological components were determined by images captured with light microscopy, using a 540-intersection grid from ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In every fifty sections, the number of primordial, primary, secondary, antral, and atretic follicles were quantified, estimating the total number of follicles per ovary. Follicles were classified and counted [16] and follicles (from primordial to antral) showing morphological signs of death such as pyknosis, cellular fragmentation, and disintegration were classified as atretic [16]. Only follicles containing an oocyte with a visible nucleus were considered to avoid double-counting.…”
Section: Ovarian Follicular Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are shown as the number of counted follicles per animal. Atresia rate (%) was determined as the number of atretic follicles/total number of follicles*100; and activation rate (%) as the number of growing follicles/ total number of follicles*100 [16].…”
Section: Ovarian Follicular Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%