2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft.2018.8405376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow the dummy: Measuring the influence of a biomimetic robotic fish-lure on the collective decisions of a zebrafish shoal inside a circular corridor

Abstract: Abstract-Robotic agents that are accepted by animals as conspecifics are very powerful tools in behavioral biology because of the ways they help in studying social interactions in gregarious animals. In recent years, we have developed a biomimetic robotic fish lure for the purpose of studying the behavior of the zebrafish Danio rerio. In this paper, we present a series of experiments that were designed to assess the impact of some features of the lure regarding its acceptance among the fish. We developed an ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, most studies choose collective parameters to analyze the interactive experimental results according to their experimental purpose. For example, the preference for robotic fish [11,20], time spent in robotic zone [14,17], probability of a collective avoidance and following [23], collective decision difference [2], the average angular distance used to characterize the different degree of individual distribution on the ring tank [9], and reaction time delay between robot and fish [22]. In this study, the collective parameters are put forward from two aspects: fish interaction proactivity and relative position relationship after interaction occurs.…”
Section: Collective Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, most studies choose collective parameters to analyze the interactive experimental results according to their experimental purpose. For example, the preference for robotic fish [11,20], time spent in robotic zone [14,17], probability of a collective avoidance and following [23], collective decision difference [2], the average angular distance used to characterize the different degree of individual distribution on the ring tank [9], and reaction time delay between robot and fish [22]. In this study, the collective parameters are put forward from two aspects: fish interaction proactivity and relative position relationship after interaction occurs.…”
Section: Collective Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the passive-dragging model, a micromotor can be installed to drive the tail fin, enabling generating anti-Karman vortex streets when being dragged [18]. Bonnet et al [19,20] successfully biased the swimming direction of fish using a fish replica robot with a swinging caudal fin in a circular tank, indicated that the caudal fin's oscillating had a significant impact on the fish's attraction than replica's color. Chemtob et al interacted a robot with a zebrafish school and modulated the behavior of the schooling fish based on observed behaviors [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%