2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Followers' problematic engagement with influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to fully understand the psychosocial impact of influencers on their followers, future research should study other variables, such as sense of belonging, loneliness, and envy, which often appear in the social networking addiction literature (Apaolaza et al, 2013; Jin & Ryu, 2020; Pittman & Reich, 2016; Tandoc et al, 2014). Farivar et al (2022) demonstrated that the physical attractiveness of influencers leads to negative affective responses from followers, such as problematic engagement. Leveraging these findings and our results, additional research could analyze whether showing up in genuine ways reduces such negative responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to fully understand the psychosocial impact of influencers on their followers, future research should study other variables, such as sense of belonging, loneliness, and envy, which often appear in the social networking addiction literature (Apaolaza et al, 2013; Jin & Ryu, 2020; Pittman & Reich, 2016; Tandoc et al, 2014). Farivar et al (2022) demonstrated that the physical attractiveness of influencers leads to negative affective responses from followers, such as problematic engagement. Leveraging these findings and our results, additional research could analyze whether showing up in genuine ways reduces such negative responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, on average, those who belong to Generation Z (i.e., those born in the late 1990s until early 2010s) have reported spending approximately three hours per day on SM, which is, on average, 45 minutes more than Millennials (i.e., those born in 1981Millennials (i.e., those born in until 1996, and double the time spent on social media by Generation X (i.e., those born in 1965until 1980Statista, 2022a). Excessive and addictive SM use can be due to numerous social pressures (Osatuyi & Turel, 2018), such as SM influencers, as influencers try to increase engagement of their followers by persuading them to participate on their SM page(s) and/or with their posts (Farivar et al, 2022). Thus, participants who spend more time on SM, have been active on SM longer, and use more SM sites may be more likely to want to be SM influencers due to high exposure to SM influencers.…”
Section: Media Watch 14(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following influencers has become one of the most popular activities (Farivar et al , 2022) that users can participate in on social media in recent years. In a competitive social media influencer market in which countless influencers attract people’s attention regularly, a critical issue is how to maximize followers’ stickiness and keep followers from switching (Hu et al , 2020) to other influencers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have begun to pay attention to the impact of social media influencers (and celebrities) on followers’ psychological benefits or disadvantages (Farivar et al , 2022; Hu et al , 2020; Kim and Kim, 2020). These studies mainly addressed a user’s emotional outcomes from a relationship-building perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation