2014
DOI: 10.1002/jls.21306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Followership in Leadership Studies: A Case of Leader–Follower Trade Approach

Abstract: The current article acknowledges the absence of followership from the leadership literature for many years. Major theories of leadership are reviewed to assert that (1) modern leadership studies have been developed strictly from the leader's perspective with little or no attention on followership, (2) leadership studies have primarily been based on the static understanding of leadership (leaders always remain leaders),1 and (3) there seems to be a need for a new paradigm for leader–follower relationships, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Engaging this support required the followers to have particular traits and knowledge. This finding aligns with studies that examine follower traits in formal employment arrangements (Campbell, Ward, Sonnenfeld, & Agle, 2008;Malakyan, 2014).…”
Section: Beyond Economic Impacts Of Festivalssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Engaging this support required the followers to have particular traits and knowledge. This finding aligns with studies that examine follower traits in formal employment arrangements (Campbell, Ward, Sonnenfeld, & Agle, 2008;Malakyan, 2014).…”
Section: Beyond Economic Impacts Of Festivalssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Its essence is conveyed below. Malakian (2014) refers to thirteen leadership approaches and points out how each of the studies omits the follower dynamic in its thesis:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the leadership research progressed during the second half of the twentieth century from the leader (trait, skill, style) to consideration of the follower and context (situational leadership, contingency and path-goal theories), the leader-member exchange (LMX) theory (Dansereau, Graen, & Haga, 1975;Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995) took another step toward the conceptualization of leadership as a process in leader-follower interactions and dyadic relationships (Northouse, 2013, p. 161), despite the fact that the in-group and out-group concepts were still leader-focused (Malakyan, 2014). Team, shared, collective, and distributed leadership furthered the understanding of group and leader-follower exchange in the leadership processes (Fisher, 1985;Hackman, 2002;Pearce & Conger, 2003;Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber, 2009).…”
Section: A Theoretical Review Of Leadership Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not shockingly, most people are not interested in followership. Most universities do not teach followership, and most leadership programs do not include followership courses in their curriculums (Malakyan, 2014). This means that the university students are not prepared to exhibit courageous followership behaviors to disobey unethical authorities or refuse to follow toxic leaders.…”
Section: Followership Dilemma In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%