2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2011.5980209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following and interpreting narrated guided tours

Abstract: We describe a robotic tour-taking capability enabling a robot to acquire local knowledge of a human-occupied environment. A tour-taking robot autonomously follows a human guide through an environment, interpreting the guide's spoken utterances and the shared spatiotemporal context in order to acquire a spatially segmented and semantically labeled metrical-topological representation of the environment. The described tour-taking capability enables scalable deployment of mobile robots into human-occupied environm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gockley et al [26] used a similar approach, with a few modifications, including using a Brownian motion model for the tracking component. This approach was further extended by Hemachandra [31], which improved the person-following component by proposing a navigation approach that accounts for personal space, while avoiding obstacles.…”
Section: Using Only Laser Scannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gockley et al [26] used a similar approach, with a few modifications, including using a Brownian motion model for the tracking component. This approach was further extended by Hemachandra [31], which improved the person-following component by proposing a navigation approach that accounts for personal space, while avoiding obstacles.…”
Section: Using Only Laser Scannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, variable environment lighting, backgrounds and appearances of people are factors which can be difficult to control for and can mislead vision-reliant tracking systems. [62] laser indoor moving local minima SJPDAF none Topp et al [69] laser indoor leg shapes (heuristic) SJPDAF ∼ potential field Gockley et al [26] laser indoor leg shapes (heuristic) NN direct & path Hemachandra et al [31] laser indoor leg shapes (heuristic) NN ∼ potential field Arras et al [2] laser indoor leg shapes (ML) MHT none Lu et al [44] laser indoor leg shapes (ML) NN none Munaro et al [52] RGB-D indoor height & HOG GNN none Gritti et al [28] RGB-D indoor leg shapes (ML) NN & PDAF none Cosgun et al [16] laser & RGB-D indoor leg shapes (heuristic) NN ∼ dynamic window Kobilarov et al [37] laser & omni-camera outdoor person shapes (heuristic) PDAF direct & path Navarro-Serment et al [53] laser outdoor person shapes (heuristic) NN none…”
Section: Using Other Sensor Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have augmented lower-level metric maps with higher-level topological and/or semantic information [7,8,9,10,11]. Zender et al [9] describe a framework for office environments in which the semantic layer models room categories and their relationship with the labels of objects within rooms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the SLAM problem, semantic mapping [23,51,19,15,36] is primarily interested in learning higher-level properties of the robot's environment. These properties include spatial attributes (like metric mapping) as well as concepts such each room's type (e.g., "hallway," or "kitchen"), their colloquial names (e.g., "Carrie's office"), or the objects that they contain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%