Following the trend in maxillofacial surgery literature

Wilson, B.; Lewis, J.; O’Hare, Phoebe Elizabeth; Lim, Chetana

doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.006

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be found at the pinnacle of them, followed in descending order by randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, case-controlled and cross-sectional studies, case reports, and expert opinions. (Wilson et al, 2021 ). Animal research would be placed at the base of them (Lee, 2014 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific production of an oral implantology journal: a 5-year bibliometric study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral implantology is a science in constant evolution, with a considerable number of articles being published every year in scientific journals. Publications can be analyzed through bibliometric analysis, thus observing the evolution and trends of the articles published in the journal. To evaluate, through bibliometric analysis, the scientific production of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (CIDRR) and its evolution and trends in the last 5 years (2016–2020).All articles published in CIDRR in the last 5 years were reviewed and classified according to the year of publication, volume, number, the number of authors, demographic data of the first and last author, the geographical scope of the article, the number of affiliations of the authors, research topic, type of study, and study design. The association between these variables and citation counts was also analyzed. 599 articles were analyzed. 77.4% were authored by 4–6 authors, obtaining 78.4% from 1 to 3 different affiliations. Male researchers predominated in both the first and last authorship. China showed the highest number of publications when comparing the origin of the authors’ affiliations individually; however, most researchers (40.9%) were from the European Union (EU)-Western Europe area. The most studied topic was the implant/abutment design/treatment of the surface (19.1%). Clinical research articles accounted for 92.99% of the publications, of which cross-sectional observational studies prevailed (21.7%). The presence of articles from the United States of America-Canada and EU-Western Europe was positively correlated with the impact factor. This study revealed an increasing trend in Asian research production, particularly Chinese, whereas production of European origin showed a decrease. Clinical studies increased their relative weight to the detriment of translational ones. A growing tendency in the relative weights of female authors was appreciated. Journal citations were associated with certain study variables.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific production of an oral implantology journal: a 5-year bibliometric study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Heat energy which is one of the most common types of energy, can be easily converted into other forms of energy thanks to energy conversion methods. Heat energy is primarily produced from fossil fuels which meet 80% of the primary energy demand in the world [1]. However, heat is a type of energy that is easily lost and a considerable amount of waste heat is generated in thermal processes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of the Effect of Using Fe + Pure Water Nano Fluid on Thermal Performance in a Two Phase Closed Thermosiphon

Martin

2021

Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım Ve Teknoloji

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heat is a type of energy that is used in many applications and can be easily converted into other types of energy. In this study, a performance analysis was carried out by using Fe + Pure water nanofluid in place of pure water in a two phase closed thermosyphon, which has a wide place in practice due to its simple structure. In the study, a copper thermosyphon with a length of 1 m, diameter of 14 mm and wall thickness of 1 mm was used. Experiments were performed with both pure water and nanofluid to make a comparison. To observe the performance of system in different operating conditions, the experiments were carried out at 3 different heating power (150, 300, 450 W) and 3 different coolant flow rates (3, 6, 9 g/s). In all experimental conditions, Fe + Pure water nanofluid had better results than pure water. The highest efficiency value was found to be 77.9% in the experiment using Fe + Pure water nanofluid, performed at 150 W power and 9 g/s water flow rate. When pure water was used in this experiment, the efficiency value was obtained as 67.7% and the improvement rate was 15%. The highest improvement rate was obtained as 50.3% in the experiment conducted at 450 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate. The use of nanofluid has also reduced the thermal resistance of the thermosyphon. The highest rate of decrease in thermal resistances was obtained as 56.7% in the experiment performed at 150 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate.

show abstract