2016
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fontan Physiology Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a systematic research of circulation models, Branko Furst, M.D., professor of anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA, found that this old pressure-propulsion paradigm no longer stands up to the rigor of scientific evidence. [196][197][198][199][200] A comprehensive review of the literature explored in his 2014 monograph (second edition in 2020), The Heart and Circulation: An Integrative Model, 201 and later summarized in a review article, 197 demonstrate that numerous phenomena, ranging from basic cardiovascular physiology to embryology, comparative anatomy and clinical medicine, contradict the conventional pressurepropulsion model. These anomalous findings call for a reappraisal of the mechanistic, solely physicalist view of the cardiovascular system that is so deeply ingrained in the collective scientific, medical, and popular psyche.…”
Section: The Heart and Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a systematic research of circulation models, Branko Furst, M.D., professor of anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA, found that this old pressure-propulsion paradigm no longer stands up to the rigor of scientific evidence. [196][197][198][199][200] A comprehensive review of the literature explored in his 2014 monograph (second edition in 2020), The Heart and Circulation: An Integrative Model, 201 and later summarized in a review article, 197 demonstrate that numerous phenomena, ranging from basic cardiovascular physiology to embryology, comparative anatomy and clinical medicine, contradict the conventional pressurepropulsion model. These anomalous findings call for a reappraisal of the mechanistic, solely physicalist view of the cardiovascular system that is so deeply ingrained in the collective scientific, medical, and popular psyche.…”
Section: The Heart and Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the multitude of morphologies and the variations of the procedures themselves (3). Venous return physiology in patients with history of Fontan surgery remains less understood and is variably being attributed to active ventricle function (4,5), to breathing and exercise (5)(6)(7)(8), or even to a different cardiovascular model seeing the heart as an impedance pump generating pressure (9). This complicated interplay between geometry and physiology has opened many questions of singleventricle circulation, and the parameters influencing hemodynamics in patients with Fontan history are not yet fully understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%