EditorialsAllergic disorders are probably the most common chronic diseases worldwide. While variations in reported prevalence across different countries exist, depending on geographical particularities and methodological heterogeneity between studies, it is universally demonstrated that the number of allergic patients has risen profoundly over the second half of the last century, posing significant morbidity, impaired quality of life and financial burden on healthcare systems in westernised countries. In the UK, which is among the countries with the highest incidence worldwide, 1 it has recently been estimated that about one-third of the entire population is affected by some type of allergic disease at some point in their lives.2 Although the demands for allergy services are burgeoning, only a small number of allergy specialists and dedicated allergy clinics are generally available.3 Within the UK National Health Service (NHS), the responsibility for diagnosis and management of the vast majority of these allergic patients largely falls to primary care services. The quality of allergy training and adequacy of general practitioners (GPs) in meeting this role is therefore critical.In two consecutive nationwide surveys of UK GPs in 2002 and 2009, less than half of the responders reported having had any type of allergy training, most of which was as undergraduate medical students.4,5 Quality of training was rated low, and only a minority of GPs reported being confident in their allergy knowledge. This was also the case in their ability to perform essential diagnostic procedures (such as skin prick testing), or competence in dealing with systemic manifestations of allergy. Overall, these national surveys of primary care providers reinforced the prevailing view that allergy care provision is not yet optimal in the UK, due to both limited access to specialised care as well as significant lack of specific training of the actual allergy service providers. 3,6 In this issue of the PCRJ, Ellis and colleagues attempt to take the analysis a step further by assessing, for the first time, the view of head officers directly in charge of GP training. 7 The authors conducted an internet-based, cross-sectional nationwide survey of General Practice Specialty Training (GPST) programme directors, enquiring about the quality of allergy training as part of GPST programmes, as well as the perceived needs for improvement of GP education in allergy. The findings are of particular interest, as they essentially confirm the educational gaps highlighted by the two previous GP surveys. 4,5 According to the directors' feedback, no specific training is being offered to GP trainees in as much as one-third of GPST programmes. The percentage is likely to be even higher: considering that directors representing 40% of programmes did not respond to the survey, it is reasonable to expect that the rate of unfavourable answers among these non-responders would be higher.Moreover, even when allergy training is reported to be delivered, the perceived quality...