“…For example, Comber et al (2012) proposed that HFI needs to pay greater attention to people and the ways in which they engage with food, rather than focusing on the efficiencies and novelties that new technologies offer; the authors also argued that due to the nuanced practices and experiences around food and technology, HFI has been evolving dynamically with the varied perspectives of understanding across transdisciplinary research fields, reflecting the diversity of ways people interact with food. For example, prior works from a range of fields, including anthropology (Holtzman, 2006;Mintz & Bois, 2002), medical sciences (Kendrick, 2008;Scrinis, 2013;Willett & Stampfer, 2013), psychology (Bays, 2017;Connor & Armitage, 2002;Rogers et al, 2016), and sociology (Schneider, 2018;Warde, 2016), have increasingly utilized food as a research vehicle to understand the beneficial impacts that the integration of food and technology can have on human health (McCurry, 2022), wellbeing (Block et al, 2011), social experiences (Chen et al, 2021), and planetary sustainability (Liu et al, 2018). This transdisciplinary nature of HFI has motivated researchers in the field to initiate a wide range of articulations of the relationships between food, human, and technology, and of HFI's social and environmental impacts.…”