Food entrepreneurship and self-employment in an island context

Abstract

PurposeThe aim is to advance the conceptualisation of island entrepreneurship by investigating how the island context, for example, industry characteristics, social context and formal and informal institutions, influences the development of artisan food businesses in that context.Design/methodology/approachAn applied, qualitative and participatory research approach was implemented. Data were collected during a business development process focusing on food artisans in the Åland Islands. In total, 19 business owners participated in the process. Key informants and public officers were interviewed, and the literature was reviewed. Interviews were analysed using phenomenography to identify representative categories, and the literature was analysed using content analysis.FindingsIsland characteristics and context, local institutions, the quality of social capital and gendered institutions influence business activities positively and negatively. Island entrepreneurship entails mobilising agencies to find innovative solutions that enable businesses to overcome obstacles. Most previous research treats business activities as entrepreneurship; however, as self-employment is essential in the island context, it should be highlighted in future studies.Research limitations/implicationsThis study illustrates how the island context influences the business development of small firms. Results indicate that local policies (1) benefitting female entrepreneurs, (2) supporting local businesses and (3) promoting locally produced artisan food could generate benefits for the entire artisan food businesses.Practical implicationsLocal policies that (1) benefit female entrepreneurs, (2) support local businesses and (3) promote locally produced artisan food have the potential to generate benefits for the entire trade. Policies can benefit from an understanding of the role played by different ecosystem actors. Promoting self-employment can generate benefits for the local entrepreneurial ecosystem by providing agglomeration and helping to solve some challenges caused by the characteristics of islands.Originality/valueEmpirically, this research enhances the knowledge of post-productive responses in the island context. Theoretically, the study advances the conceptualisation of research on the island entrepreneurship context and the local food debate.

Exploring the dynamics of innovation: patterns of growth and contraction in the local food industry

“…, 2019; Şahin and Yılmaz, 2022). Examples include the creation of new markets for local food and new business models that enable producers and consumers to meet and exchange products, experiences and values (Rytkönen et al. , 2023).…”

“…This trend has been reinforced by policy development focused on localized food and business development (Melak and Derbe, 2022;Jensen et al, 2019;S ¸ahin and Yılmaz, 2022). Examples include the creation of new markets for local food and new business models that enable producers and consumers to meet and exchange products, experiences and values (Rytk€ onen et al, 2023). Moreover, LFIs have become an engine behind entrepreneurship and innovation in rural tourism through new services, products and ways of utilizing existing resources (Rachão et al, 2019).…”

The Entrepreneurial Process in a Remote Island Context: The Case of Madeira

“…Entrepreneurial activity in remote islands is challenging. Rytkönen et al (2023) argued, "Islands constitute a specific type of business context, frequently described in terms of their remote location and often peripheral status, the characteristics of island culture and geography" (p. 239). Firms created in small island territories will face limited linkage to the local economy, lack of local business knowhow, and a scarcity of quality support and infrastructure services (Baldacchino, 2005).…”

Fifty years of artisan entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review

“…Social identity is also the consequence of developing artisan entrepreneurship because it is focused on a common goal (socio-economic). After all, small businesses are the result of this focus (Fuller, 2003) and strengthening their social identity (Rytkonen, et al, 2023;Riddering, 2016) (Fig. 4).…”