2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food for thought: Conditions for discourse reflection in the light of environmental assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus here is on EIA's role in creating discursive spaces that facilitate the engagement of public actors in the decision-making process (Rozema et al 2012). From this perspective EIA has the potential to increase not only the legitimacy of the process as a whole, but also the capacity for social learning among the participating actors (Wilkins 2003, Runhaar et al 2010. The EIA process can thus serve as a means to consider alternative options for manoeuvre and to broaden the areas of discussion (Saarikoski 2000, Stirling andGee 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus here is on EIA's role in creating discursive spaces that facilitate the engagement of public actors in the decision-making process (Rozema et al 2012). From this perspective EIA has the potential to increase not only the legitimacy of the process as a whole, but also the capacity for social learning among the participating actors (Wilkins 2003, Runhaar et al 2010. The EIA process can thus serve as a means to consider alternative options for manoeuvre and to broaden the areas of discussion (Saarikoski 2000, Stirling andGee 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bond et al (2010) found that knowledge needs to be managed in an impact assessment process, and a learning approach needs to be adopted in order to accommodate plurality of views and move towards sustainable decision-making. Runhaar et al (2010) indicate that actors involved in impact assessment selectively interpret knowledge generated through the process as they are subject to a variety of discourses which act as filters that sieve the relevant from the irrelevant. The end result can be that dominant discourses take over and knowledge which is inconsistent with them can be ignored (although knowledge is no less valid simply because it does not support certain discourses).…”
Section: Figure 151 Inter-linkages Between Effectiveness Criteria Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting sustainability goals operationalizing and contextualizing a sustainability vision is a key step in translating that framing into manageable decision-supporting information as proposed by [26]. Sustainability assessment can also contribute to discourse reflection and formation [47]. Stimulating decision-makers and other stakeholders to critically reflect upon and to reconsider their perspectives on sustainability may enhance the chance of sustainability assessment to influencing decision-making.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%