Food for thought: “four Ss with one F”

Abstract

PurposeThis review aims to reexamine the main issues of the food problem under a new concept coined as “Four Ss with one F”. It aims to provide a stimulus for thinking food problems through a simple formula “Four Ss with one F” for getting the “full” story at a glance.Design/methodology/approachThis descriptive paper is based on an extensive literature review as well as personal observations gained from previous studies.FindingsThe three Ss, security or insecurity, safety, and sovereignty have been major topics in the public agenda for a long time as food‐related problems. When the basic idea “food for all” is considered, these are not inclusive enough. The fourth concept can be described as shareability. These concepts are not competitive but complementary, even overlapping to some extent. Food sovereignty and shareability can be considered opposing concepts to the available free‐market based approaches in the efforts to bring all people food security and food safety. This revision evidenced that despite the many efforts in this field for several decades, present free market oriented approaches have not led to solutions to the problem of food security and providing safe food to all people, i.e. “food for all”. Hunger does not result from a shortage in the food supply as generally argued. The food problem is related to poverty and the inability to purchase food. It is not possible to solve hunger and nutrition problems and maintain a permanent social peace without equality and justice in income distribution throughout the world in such a way that poor people have enough income to access vital basic food needs.Originality/valueThis paper introduces a new concept in food science as shareability along with considering previous concepts of food, security, safety and sovereignty, all together.

Drought assessment in paddy rice fields using remote sensing technology towards achieving food security and SDG2

“…However, this would cover only a part of the requirements to achieve “food for all” and partially supports moving towards SDG2. Thus, other proper actions must be taken to reach food security and provide safe food to all people (Rehber, 2012) in a system thinking framework (Ranjbari et al. , 2019).…”

The emergence of biological invasions on food chains: a DPSIR analysis

“…Alien species may lower the agricultural production, alter the domestic environment and create problems in trade issues in terms of impacting crops, livestock and jeopardising food industries. The concomitant impacts on global food security are evident across the recurrent food crises that are a combination of volatile prices of oil and other factors of production with other factors that threatened food consumption such as human diseases and pest, mainly imported by alien species (Rehber, 2012).…”

The soil–peace nexus: our common future

“…Thus, it is appropriate to address the major challenge of achieving sustainable global food security through "leverage points" (West et al 2014). For example, Rehber (2012) addressed food security in the context of four Ss with one F. These complementary and overlapping concepts are security, safety, sovereignty, and shareability of food. Poverty determines the accessibility, and soil quality and its management are important to eradicating the poverty of rural and urban populations.…”