“…We found that 10.28% of hospital food samples were contaminated with S. aureus strains which were entirely considerable. This prevalence rate of S. aureus in hospital food sample was higher than that of Gutiérrez et al () (Spain, 6.10% in food samples), Hanson et al () (United States, 6.90% in beef), while was lower than those of Yang et al () (China, 12.50% in ready to eat foods), Jackson, Davis, & Barrett, (United States, 45–63% in beef and pork), Caggiano et al () (Italy, 26.30% in nasal swab samples of food industry workers), Kasturwar and Shafee () (Maharashtra, 36.14% prevalence of MRSA in food handlers), Castro, Santos, Meireles, Silva, and Teixeira () (Portugal, 19.80% in nasal and 11.10% in hand swabs of food handlers), Ferreira et al () (Brazil, 50% in food handlers of hospitals), Dagnew, Tiruneh, Moges, and Tekeste () (Ethiopia, 20.50% in food handlers), de Jonge, Verdier, and Havelaar () (the Netherlands, 14.28% in meat samples), SergeliDiS et al () (Greece, 27% in ready to eat salad), Bunnueang et al () (Thailand, 83% in hospital foods), and Momtaz, Dehkordi, Rahimi, Ezadi, and Arab () (Iran, 28.05% in chicken meat). Findings of our previous study (F. S. Dehkordi et al, ) revealed that the prevalence of MRSA strains in raw hospital food samples with animal origin, cooked hospital food samples with animal origin and hospital food samples without animal origin were 16.66%, 9.09% and 4.08% which showed the higher prevalence of bacteria in raw food samples with animal origin.…”