Food intake and appetite following school-based high-intensity interval training in 9–11-year-old children

Abstract

. (2018) 'Food intake and appetite following school-based high-intensity interval training in 911-year-old children.', Journal of sports sciences., 36 (3). pp. 286-292. Further information on publisher's website: Additional information:Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. caroline.dodd-reynolds@durham.ac.uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:The authors thank the school, the children and their parents, the head teacher and the cook for their participation in this study. 1 ABSTRACTUsing a randomised cross-over design, free-living lunch intake and subjective appetite were examined in 10 children (9.8±0.6 years) following high intensity interval training (HIIT) versus a control sedentary (SED) period, within a school setting. The 22 minute HIIT took place during a regular PE lesson and consisted of two rounds of 4 x 30 second sprints. Foods were offered at a regular school lunch immediately following HIIT and SED and were matched between conditions. All food was covertly weighed before and after the meal. Hunger, fullness and prospective consumption were reported immediately before and after HIIT/SED, using visual analogue scales. Heart rate was higher during HIIT than SED

Homeostatic and neurocognitive control of energy intake in response to exercise in pediatric obesity: a psychobiological framework

“…recently investigated the appetite and EI response to a 22‐min HIIE physical education session in normal‐weight 9 to 11‐year‐old children . Their results reinforce the conclusions of the above cited meta‐analysis finding no modification of appetite feelings, energy or macronutrient intake after HIIE in normal‐weight kids . In a recent study from our research group, we tested the effect of such a HIIE session on EI and appetite in 12 to 15‐year‐old youth with obesity .…”

“…Interestingly, while High Intensity Interval Exercises (HIIE) and Sprint Interval Trainings are actually advocated and promoted for their time‐efficient nature and beneficial effects on adiposity and cardio‐metabolic health, Morris et al . recently investigated the appetite and EI response to a 22‐min HIIE physical education session in normal‐weight 9 to 11‐year‐old children . Their results reinforce the conclusions of the above cited meta‐analysis finding no modification of appetite feelings, energy or macronutrient intake after HIIE in normal‐weight kids .…”

Classroom-Based Micro-Sessions of Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Enhances Functional Strength but Not Cardiorespiratory Fitness in School Children—A Feasibility Study

“…Since children spend 40% of their waking hours in the school (14) it seems the school setting is ideal to implement PA promotion. In this context HIIT was recently applied within physical education (PE) classes of children (15, 16) and adolescent students (17, 18) to enhance CRF [determined by a shuttle run (17, 18) and 6 min walking test (16)]. Additionally, HIIT not only improved CRF but also functional strength when applied for relative short periods of 7–10 weeks with 1–3 sessions/week (19, 20).…”

Impact of physical activity on caloric and macronutrient intake in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

“…The studies were published between 2009 and 2020. Most studies were conducted in Europe ( n = 17; 67%) [ 60 , 62 – 68 , 71 – 79 ] followed by Canada and USA (both n = 2; 13%) [ 58 , 59 , 61 , 70 ]. In general, a frequently implemented design in the included trials was the following: after a preliminary visit where baseline characteristics where collected, participants then visited a controlled environment for one to five intervention days, where data for primary and secondary outcomes where measured.…”

“…Thirteen studies examined two post-intervention meals, usually lunch and dinner [ 61 , 63 – 65 , 67 , 70 – 72 , 75 – 78 , 80 ]. Eight studies had one post-intervention meal [ 58 – 60 , 62 , 66 , 68 , 69 , 79 ]. One study had three test meals [ 73 ].…”