2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60036-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Matters: Changing Dimensions of Science and Practice in the Nutrition Profession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The profession of dietetics has worked hard to position itself as a scientific endeavor. With its roots in nursing and home-economics (Cassell, 1990), dietetics as a female-dominated profession has actively employed the language, protocols, and practices of biomedicine in order to acquire the recognition and status associated with "legitimate" health professions (Liquori, 2001). Inherent in this quest is the unquestioned adoption of the scientific method, which ensures that the findings of experimental studies are generalizable across settings, are the result of the intervention being studied (as opposed to chance), and are free from bias, particularly those imposed by researchers and other confounding variables (Bauer, 1992).…”
Section: First Person Storytelling: How Do We Tell Our Story?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profession of dietetics has worked hard to position itself as a scientific endeavor. With its roots in nursing and home-economics (Cassell, 1990), dietetics as a female-dominated profession has actively employed the language, protocols, and practices of biomedicine in order to acquire the recognition and status associated with "legitimate" health professions (Liquori, 2001). Inherent in this quest is the unquestioned adoption of the scientific method, which ensures that the findings of experimental studies are generalizable across settings, are the result of the intervention being studied (as opposed to chance), and are free from bias, particularly those imposed by researchers and other confounding variables (Bauer, 1992).…”
Section: First Person Storytelling: How Do We Tell Our Story?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). We were both familiar with Antoniou's (2004) paper and dietetic literature offering more conventional and critical perspectives of dietetic discourse (see DeVault, 1999;Gringras & Brady, 2010;Liquori, 2001;Travers, 1995), and thus did not review any additional literature specifically for the project prior to coming together to cook. For future projects, particularly if researcher-participants hail from more divergent backgrounds, it would be useful to circulate reading materials pertinent to the question or theme at hand at this stage to ground and further guide the dialogue and writing activities during the foodmaking session.…”
Section: Identify the Theme Problem Or Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). It should be said that some have offered critical perspectives of dietetics' epistemological and ontological orientation (Aphramor & Gingras, 2009; Buchanan, 2004; Gingras & Brady, 2010; Liquori, 2001; Travers, 1995), but this work has yet to be taken up more widely by practitioners or dietetics' professional organizations. Given the potential for dietitians to further social justice, we set out to unsettle and politicize dominant dietetic discourse.…”
Section: Stirring the Potmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrition profession has shied away from talking about food intertwined with nurturance because of the "scientification" of food as nutrients and marketable products. 12 We need to increase our understanding of the significance of food, not purely in relation to nutrition value, but as an important quality of life issue. 13 Let me expand on Dr Timothy Lipman's JPEN editorial from a few years ago in which he described the "chicken soup paradigm, namely, healing through the provision of nutrients."…”
Section: July-august 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%