1991
DOI: 10.1071/mu9910318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food of Little PenguinsEudyptula minorin Victoria: Comparison of Three Localities between 1985 and 1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
82
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated mean clutch completion date on Motuara Island in this study (29 September) was 4-6 weeks later than in the 1995 and 1996 breeding seasons (Renner 1998). Such delays may be related to limited food supply earlier in the year, as suggested by Cullen et al (1992). The low body mass gain while foraging recorded for the earliest female breeder of the Oamaru study area supports this assumption.…”
Section: Motuara Islandsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The estimated mean clutch completion date on Motuara Island in this study (29 September) was 4-6 weeks later than in the 1995 and 1996 breeding seasons (Renner 1998). Such delays may be related to limited food supply earlier in the year, as suggested by Cullen et al (1992). The low body mass gain while foraging recorded for the earliest female breeder of the Oamaru study area supports this assumption.…”
Section: Motuara Islandsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Very little information is available on the phenology of barracouta. However, and given that this species grows quickly (reaching 23-30 cm in the first year, Kailola et al, 1993), we can deduce little penguins are feeding on very young individuals (fish consumed range from 3 to 5 cm long Cullen et al, 1992;Chiaradia et al, 2003). Similarly, it is post-larval anchovy that are eaten at the times of year when this species is most frequent in the diet of penguins (Montague and Cullen, 1988).…”
Section: Proactive Decisions Vs Passive Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate may be lower for incubating birds and those with very small chicks; however, this figure provides a benchmark on which to sanity test our observations. If all prey captures identified by the SVM represent actual prey captures, prey consumed by little penguins in our study had a mean mass of ~2.8 g. The mean mass of ingested fish species estimated from diet reconstruction for little penguins at Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia, ranged from 0.9 g (red cod) to 10.7 g (garfish), with a mean of ~4.9 g per item across all fish species (Cullen et al, 1991). Small (1-5 cm) schooling fish were the primary component of the diet of little penguins around Montague Island in 2013, with penguins also eating krill when transient swarms entered the area (G.C., unpublished data).…”
Section: Foraging Efficiency and Prey Capture Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%