2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food policy in the Canadian North: Is there a role for country food markets?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alaska might also consider other more comprehensive or innovative policy initiatives that strengthen traditional food security in the Arctic such as the recent Nunavut Food Security Strategy and Action Plan [53] or investigating the feasibility of the development of traditional food markets [54]. The Nunavut strategy includes guiding principles and the incorporation of six dimensions of food security: country/traditional food, store bought food, local food, life skills, program and community initiatives, and policy and legislation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alaska might also consider other more comprehensive or innovative policy initiatives that strengthen traditional food security in the Arctic such as the recent Nunavut Food Security Strategy and Action Plan [53] or investigating the feasibility of the development of traditional food markets [54]. The Nunavut strategy includes guiding principles and the incorporation of six dimensions of food security: country/traditional food, store bought food, local food, life skills, program and community initiatives, and policy and legislation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commodification of country foods (including commercial harvests/fisheries, country food stores/markets) is posed as a strategy to support broader access, particularly in larger settlements and for households that lack hunters or food sharing networks (Duhaime et al, 2002;Ford, Macdonald, Huet, Statham, & MacRury, 2016). Historically, country food commodification programs largely resulted in exports to non-Inuit markets and, despite providing economic benefits to communities (Duhaime et al, 2002;Whittles, 2014), appear to have had negligible impacts on local country food access and food security (Council of Canadian Academies, 2014).…”
Section: Country Food Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: histories and ongoing pressures of colonialism and land dispossession that have disconnected Indigenous peoples from their land and local knowledge of food practices [21,22], high burden of existing food security challenges [18], structural inequities characterized by lack of access to land and other resources [23][24][25], and habitation in areas undergoing rapid environmental change, biodiversity loss, and competing demands for land for food production [26]. Indeed, Indigenous communities in many countries tend to be more food insecure than their non-Indigenous counterparts [27][28][29]; for example, Indigenous peoples in the United States including American Indians and Alaska Natives were twice as likely to be food insecure compared to non-Indigenous peoples [30]. Around 97% of Indigenous Batwa households in Uganda were found to be food insecure, which was substantially higher than the national Ugandan average of 20% [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%