1980
DOI: 10.1016/0306-9192(80)90127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food prices and food policy analysis in LDCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, for most of the studied food groups, particularly for grains, meats, and eggs, the demand by low‐income households is shown to be more responsive to own‐price changes than the demand by medium‐ and high‐income groups. Because low‐income households spend a larger percentage of their incomes on food, higher food prices have a disproportionately large impact on them as compared to medium‐ and high‐income households (Timmer, 1980). Therefore, if the public policy goal is to encourage the consumption of certain food categories as a mean to alleviate poverty and to improve the nutrition of low‐income individuals, the findings of this study support the allocation of price subsidies to low‐income households.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, for most of the studied food groups, particularly for grains, meats, and eggs, the demand by low‐income households is shown to be more responsive to own‐price changes than the demand by medium‐ and high‐income groups. Because low‐income households spend a larger percentage of their incomes on food, higher food prices have a disproportionately large impact on them as compared to medium‐ and high‐income households (Timmer, 1980). Therefore, if the public policy goal is to encourage the consumption of certain food categories as a mean to alleviate poverty and to improve the nutrition of low‐income individuals, the findings of this study support the allocation of price subsidies to low‐income households.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economic terms, it means that the income elasticity of food demand is between 0 and 1. There are causal and direct mechanisms in the food consumption patterns of populations: when the middle and upper households dispose of higher incomes, they tend to increase the demand for livestock products, reducing the intake of grains and cereals (Timmer and Pearson, 1983).…”
Section: Origin and Evolution Of Vegetarianism And Veganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common finding from the previous studies is that a fall in output prices makes all producers to be worse off and tends to have a disproportionately large impact on farmers producing significant market surpluses (Timmer, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies implicitly assume that producers' behaviors are uniform and thereby predict the consequences of ex‐ante behaviors using ex‐post behaviors when output price changes. The common finding from the previous studies is that a fall in output prices makes all producers to be worse off and tends to have a disproportionately large impact on farmers producing significant market surpluses (Timmer, 1980). While the result is suitable for the case where producers have made a uniform supply response, it cannot be fully applied to the case where producers have made heterogeneous supply responses, to a price shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%