2009
DOI: 10.3386/w15096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Prices and the Dynamics of Body Weight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 This assumption finds empirical support in the dynamic models of body mass estimated by Goldman et al (2010) and Ng et 16 In contrast, serial correlation in the residuals of static wage regressions, which dominate the previous literature, is expected because those residuals are not independent of lagged wages. The dynamic estimation in the current paper, therefore, supports the comments in Cawley (2004) about serial correlation in the previous literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…18 This assumption finds empirical support in the dynamic models of body mass estimated by Goldman et al (2010) and Ng et 16 In contrast, serial correlation in the residuals of static wage regressions, which dominate the previous literature, is expected because those residuals are not independent of lagged wages. The dynamic estimation in the current paper, therefore, supports the comments in Cawley (2004) about serial correlation in the previous literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Just (2006) provides more general evidence of the limited price-responsiveness of food consumption. Goldman et al (2009) show very small short-run effects of food prices on weight: a 10 percent increase in the money price is predicted to increase average BMI by just 0.6 percent (0.22 kg/m 2 ) after two years. They obtain substantially larger long-run elasticities but these depend on functionalform assumptions of model used, rather than being directly estimated.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the average weight gain has been too abrupt to be the result of a major genetic evolution several scholars have recently focused on other possible explanations such as: the decrease in real food prices (Goldman et al, 2011, Philipson and Posner, 2003, 2008, the reduction of the time cost of food (Cutler et al, 2003, Ruhm, 2012, technological changes due to economic growth (Huffman et al, 2010, Lakdawalla andPhilipson, 2009) or the introduction of welfare-improving technological change (Lakdawalla et al, 2006). However, these explanations are able to explain just partially the so-called "obesity epidemic" (Cawley, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%