1984
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1984.9516027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food resources and ingestion patterns of insects along a West Coast, South Island, river system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals were sorted from the substrate at 40x magnification, and were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Species were assigned to functional feeding groups according to Winterbourn et al (1984) and Chadderton (1988).…”
Section: Study Sites and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were sorted from the substrate at 40x magnification, and were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Species were assigned to functional feeding groups according to Winterbourn et al (1984) and Chadderton (1988).…”
Section: Study Sites and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study animal, the leptophlebiid mayfly Deleatidium spp., is a ubiquitous member of New Zealand stream faunas, comprising as much as 90% of total macroinvertebrate numbers in streams of the Taieri River catchment (Scarsbrook and Townsend 1993). It is impossible, given current taxonomy, to identify individual species of Deleatidium as nymphs, although two species groups are recognized (Winterbourn and Gregson 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleatidium is a collector-browser and consumes a large amount of algae (Rounick et al 1982;Winterbourn et al 1984;Collier and Winterbourn 1990). If brown trout were inhibiting mayfly grazing during the day, then we would expect mayflies from streams with trout to have more algae in their guts at night than during the day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mid-gut of individuals was then dissected for analysis. Stomach contents were placed in vials and stained with Bengal´s rose colorant for 24 h. These samples were then transferred to distilled water and mixed; fifteen fields per slide were randomly selected and food items were counted under a microscope at a 400 X magnification (Winterbourn et al, 1984;Díaz-Villanueva and Albariño, 1999). For each item, the length and area covered were measured with a graduate eyepiece, and the relative abundance was expressed as a percentage of the area occupied by the total gut content (Winterbourn et al, 1984;Jaarsma et al, 1998;Díaz-Villanueva and Albariño, 1999;Muñoz et al, 2009).…”
Section: Gut Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%