2014
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food resources and vegetation structure mediate climatic effects on species richness of birds

Abstract: Aim Climate is widely recognized as a major predictor of species richness patterns along large‐scale environmental gradients. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which climate influences species richness are still a matter of debate. We disentangle whether climate influences species richness of birds directly via physiological limitations or indirectly via vegetation structure or the availability of food resources. Location Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Methods We recorded bird species richness along an elevational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
227
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
17
227
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vegetation structure had the strongest effect on species richness and abundance of insectivorous birds, with higher complexity of vegetation structure positively associated with species richness and abundance of most insectivores, especially bark-gleaning, sallying, terrestrial, and understory insectivores (Ferger et al 2014;Mammides et al 2015). In our study area, vegetation structure within 100 m from the edge was generally simpler, with only one or two layers of particularly dense small trees and saplings and a greater cover of vegetation near ground level.…”
Section: Influence Of Vegetation Structure On Avian Communitymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vegetation structure had the strongest effect on species richness and abundance of insectivorous birds, with higher complexity of vegetation structure positively associated with species richness and abundance of most insectivores, especially bark-gleaning, sallying, terrestrial, and understory insectivores (Ferger et al 2014;Mammides et al 2015). In our study area, vegetation structure within 100 m from the edge was generally simpler, with only one or two layers of particularly dense small trees and saplings and a greater cover of vegetation near ground level.…”
Section: Influence Of Vegetation Structure On Avian Communitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The reduced layers of small trees may limit shelter and foraging substrates for sallying and understory insectivores, such as the Black-naped Monarch (Hypothymis azurea) and Orange-breasted Trogon (Harpactes oreskios); whereas the greater cover at ground level may be an obstacle to terrestrial insectivores such as the Puff-throated Babbler (Pellorneum ruficeps). In contrast, the forest interior had a more complex vegetation structure, with a higher basal area, higher density of larger trees, more vegetation layers, and less ground cover, which probably provided more diverse arthropod resources and foraging habitats (Ferger et al 2014). Bark-gleaning woodpeckers and understory insectivores (trogons and kingfishers) also were negatively affected by the edge.…”
Section: Influence Of Vegetation Structure On Avian Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HS2 had complex vegetation, offering more niches and higher levels of plant. It contributed to more bird species diversity (Pearman, 2002;Miller et al, 2004;Ferger et al, 2014). Feet al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By stepwise refitting, we simplified the SEMs, removing non-significant links conditional on the model fit, i.e. assessed by the x 2 test, CFI, and RMSA, being satisfied [60,61]. As the two final SEMs differ in the number of climate variables included (see Results; figure 2), we cannot use the x 2 test, CFI, and RMSA measures of fit for comparison of model fit among the final SEM models.…”
Section: (D) Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%