2015
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2015.1703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food restriction during pregnancy: effects on body condition and productive performance of primiparous rabbit does

Abstract: This study examined the effects of feed restriction at different stages of rabbit pregnancy on body condition and productive performance. Just after insemination, pregnant primiparous New Zealand White does were assigned to 4 groups (10/group): the control group (C) was fed with 130 g/d of commercial feed while the others received 90 g/d from day 0 to 9 (R1), from day 9 to 18 (R2) or from day 19 to 28 (R3) of pregnancy and 130 g/d the remaining periods. A 3-point scale for loin and rump was used to calculate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of effects of MFR on maternal bodyweight found in the current study supports previous studies in rabbits [30, 38, 41] and differs from other animal species in which the application of MFR resulted in maternal bodyweight loss, like rodents [5053], sheep [54, 55] and primates [56, 57]. These differences between species and experimental studies may be related to feeding management ( ad libitum feeding vs maintenance requirements), fat stores prior to the experimental phase, or may be as well associated to reproductive strategies adopted by the mothers [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of effects of MFR on maternal bodyweight found in the current study supports previous studies in rabbits [30, 38, 41] and differs from other animal species in which the application of MFR resulted in maternal bodyweight loss, like rodents [5053], sheep [54, 55] and primates [56, 57]. These differences between species and experimental studies may be related to feeding management ( ad libitum feeding vs maintenance requirements), fat stores prior to the experimental phase, or may be as well associated to reproductive strategies adopted by the mothers [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In rabbits, the effects of MFR during gestation [17, 30, 31, 3541] vary depending on the period of the pregnancy exposed, the level of the restriction applied and the capacity of the mother to compensate, particularly during late pregnancy when fetal growth is maximal [42]. When it comes to the mother, MFR is usually linked to metabolic and hormonal changes [3537] and low milk production [38]. Meanwhile, in the fetus, hemodynamic alterations and poor biometric outcomes can be observed [17, 30, 31, 3941].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 70% reduction in feed intake (30% of control) during the last third of rabbit pregnancy also reduces maternal weight and leads to asymmetric IUGR (Eixarch et al, 2011;Illa et al, 2017;Matsuoka et al, 2006). Whereas, 35-40% reduction in maternal food intake (60-75% of control) from early in gestation has little to no effect on maternal weight gain and a more variable and less severe impact of fetal viability and growth (Goliomytis et al, 2016;Manal, Tony, & Ezzo, 2010;Menchetti, Brecchia, Cardinali, Polisca, & Boiti, 2015;Nafeaa, Ahmed, & Fat Hallah, 2011;Rommers, Meijerhof, Noordhuizen, & Kemp, 2004).…”
Section: Undernutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may vary depending on severity and duration (Rommers et al, 2004), moment of application (Menchetti et al, 2015b) and feed intake adaptation to the nutritive values of feed (Arias-Alvarez et al, 2009;Rebollar et al, 2011). In our experiment, the feeding programme had no effect on nutrient intake from 9 to 13 wk of age (1658 kJ DE/d and 17 g DP/d) and from 18 to 20 wk of age (1487 DE/d and 15 g DP/d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%