2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-010-0077-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food security and poverty in Mexico: the impact of higher global food prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen of these were excluded, as they did not measure food security explicitly (e.g. [ 45 , 46 ] or the food security indicator/method of measurement was not described (e.g. [ 47 ] or they used ‘inappropriate’ indicators that do not capture at least one of the four food security dimensions (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen of these were excluded, as they did not measure food security explicitly (e.g. [ 45 , 46 ] or the food security indicator/method of measurement was not described (e.g. [ 47 ] or they used ‘inappropriate’ indicators that do not capture at least one of the four food security dimensions (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of food expenditures have been conducted by some scholars, but the majority focuses on the composition of food consumed and its relationship with income [22,23], economic growth [24,25], as well as urbanization [5,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In addition, other studies showed the relationship between food consumption composition with poverty [33][34][35] and unemployment [36][37][38][39][40] showing that both issues limit people's ability to consume more various and healthier food. It should be of concern that currently, the connection among regions has been increased extensively; thus, the flow of goods and people, including food products, has become more intense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only study utilizing Mexican household survey data for two different years is González Dávila (), which focusing on corn prices, finds an evident decay in household living standards from 2006 to 2008. These results show that the poorest rural and urban households, net buyers of corn, were the most affected as their budget share on corn increased significantly.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%