2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food sharing, redistribution, and waste reduction via mobile applications: A social network analysis

Abstract: Food sharing mobile applications are becoming increasingly popular, but little is known about the new social configurations of people using them, particularly those applications that use consumers as voluntary intermediaries in supply chains. This article presents a social network analysis of a food sharing mobile application conducted in partnership with OLIO. The study focuses on longitudinal social network data from 54913 instances of food sharing between 9054 people and was collected over 10 months. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
114
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Rebound effects are particularly relevant for people in lower income brackets, such as those experiencing food insecurity, who tend to spend any additional income on fulfilling basic family needs. Since sharing economy platforms are free of the social stigma associated with seeking help from food banks and similar charities, they have been touted as a potentially promising avenue for reducing food waste while addressing the challenge of hunger and food insecurity simultaneously 50 . Yet as our results on the demographic make-up of users highlight, food-sharing recipients tend be of lower income but higher education brackets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rebound effects are particularly relevant for people in lower income brackets, such as those experiencing food insecurity, who tend to spend any additional income on fulfilling basic family needs. Since sharing economy platforms are free of the social stigma associated with seeking help from food banks and similar charities, they have been touted as a potentially promising avenue for reducing food waste while addressing the challenge of hunger and food insecurity simultaneously 50 . Yet as our results on the demographic make-up of users highlight, food-sharing recipients tend be of lower income but higher education brackets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite growing interest in the sharing economy, and food sharing in particular 50,[52][53][54][55] , data-driven analyses of food sharing remain scarce. Here we empirically investigate the full life-cycle environmental impacts of a popular P2P food-sharing platform and examine exchanges from a socio-economic perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have a strong research potential in many areas, especially considering that understanding people’s communication on social media is essential for understanding their attitudes, experiences, behaviors, and values [ 6 , 7 ]. In the field of food, studies have already analyzed social network data in the context of farmers’ markets [ 8 ], organic food [ 9 ], undergraduate students’ food choices [ 10 ], food sharing [ 11 ], and food security [ 12 ]. At present, social networks are used by around 3.6 billion people worldwide, and it has been predicted that more than 4.41 billion people will use social networks in 2025 [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of the digital economy and an increasingly digitally connected society has produced a spectrum of new sharing relationships. These range from food sharing [11], to crowdfunding [12], mass digital fundraising [13] and slacktivism [14,15]. Some of these activities are characterised as ‘digital philanthropy’: the process of donating various types and forms of data by companies for public good [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%