2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2239-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food supplementation affects the foraging ecology of a low-energy, ambush-foraging snake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model predicts that it is advantageous for ambush‐foraging snakes to down‐regulate digestive systems when not digesting since the energetic savings accrued exceed the resulting additional costs of up‐regulation (increased apparent specific dynamic action [SDA]; Secor, ). However, our meta‐analysis reveals that average meal size does not differ between ambush and active foragers, and several recent autecological studies using fixed videography—one of the least‐biased data collecting techniques because it directly records feeding events (Lewis, Fuller, & Titus, ; Reif & Tornberg, )—on ambush‐foraging snakes have shown that feeding is more frequent than previously thought for most species (Clark, ; Clark, Tangco, & Barbour, ; Glaudas & Alexander, ; Putman, Barbour, & Clark, ). These findings suggest that meal size and frequency may not be drastically different between feeding modes and thus raises questions about the basic assumptions regarding the selective forces that have resulted in digestive down‐regulation in ambush‐foraging snakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The model predicts that it is advantageous for ambush‐foraging snakes to down‐regulate digestive systems when not digesting since the energetic savings accrued exceed the resulting additional costs of up‐regulation (increased apparent specific dynamic action [SDA]; Secor, ). However, our meta‐analysis reveals that average meal size does not differ between ambush and active foragers, and several recent autecological studies using fixed videography—one of the least‐biased data collecting techniques because it directly records feeding events (Lewis, Fuller, & Titus, ; Reif & Tornberg, )—on ambush‐foraging snakes have shown that feeding is more frequent than previously thought for most species (Clark, ; Clark, Tangco, & Barbour, ; Glaudas & Alexander, ; Putman, Barbour, & Clark, ). These findings suggest that meal size and frequency may not be drastically different between feeding modes and thus raises questions about the basic assumptions regarding the selective forces that have resulted in digestive down‐regulation in ambush‐foraging snakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Wasko and Sasa () determined both sexes of terciopelos ( Bothrops asper ) that were food supplemented in a prey‐limited environment in Costa Rica did not differ in home range sizes, but supplemented snakes had shorter and less frequent movements than unfed controls. Glaudas and Alexander () found naturally foraging male puff adders ( Bitis arietans ) also did not differ in home range size but moved farther within defined home ranges to find ambush sites compared to food‐supplemented males. These results suggest that food supplementation may affect the movements of vipers in ways that vary geographically, temporally, and demographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This largely stationary foraging tactic may reduce the available time to move to find mates, as some male vipers feed during the breeding season (Tetzlaff, Ravesi, Parker, Forzley, & Kingsbury, 2015) or may even increase feeding frequency compared to the nonbreeding season (Webber, Glaudas, & Rodrıguez-Robles, 2012). As such, males of numerous snake species decrease feeding rates (Glaudas & Alexander, 2017) or fast (Daltry, Wuster, & Thorpe, 1998;Slip & Shine, 1988) during the breeding season, suggesting foraging may come at the expense of increasing reproductive opportunities for these species. Male snakes which have built up energy reserves from feeding could invest substantial effort into finding females, given the high energetic investment of reproduction (Bonnet & Naulleau, 1996;Olsson, Madsen, & Shine, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As part of a food supplementation study on adult male puff adders from 2013 to 2015 (Glaudas & Alexander, ), we offered pre‐killed striped mice ( Rhabdomys pumilio ), a natural prey species, for a 2‐month period to six individuals each year (18 individuals overall). We used radiotelemetry to locate the snakes, and fed them in situ from 8‐Jan to 13‐Mar in 2013, 15‐Jan to 7‐Mar in 2014, and 13‐Jan to 5‐Mar in 2015.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%