2008
DOI: 10.3161/000164508x395252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Supply and External Cues Limit the Clutch Size and Hatchability in the White StorkCiconia ciconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Density-dependent patterns of reproductive success of white storks in Slovenia were suggested to arise due to the intra-specific exploitation competition, which is consistent with our results (Denac 2006). This hypothesis was also supported by food supplementation experiments which demonstrated that, at least in some populations, reproductive success of white storks is limited by the food availability during the breeding season (Djerdali et al 2008). Similarly, it was found that stork pairs occupying territories with unlimited anthropogenic food supplies and negligible intra-specific competition (e.g., near rubbish dumps) had higher reproductive success in comparison to pairs that exploited natural food resources, even if their territories were of good quality (Tortosa et al 2002;Massemin-Challet et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Density-dependent patterns of reproductive success of white storks in Slovenia were suggested to arise due to the intra-specific exploitation competition, which is consistent with our results (Denac 2006). This hypothesis was also supported by food supplementation experiments which demonstrated that, at least in some populations, reproductive success of white storks is limited by the food availability during the breeding season (Djerdali et al 2008). Similarly, it was found that stork pairs occupying territories with unlimited anthropogenic food supplies and negligible intra-specific competition (e.g., near rubbish dumps) had higher reproductive success in comparison to pairs that exploited natural food resources, even if their territories were of good quality (Tortosa et al 2002;Massemin-Challet et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Schulz 1998;Massemin-Challet et al 2006;Djerdali et al 2008;Kosicki 2010;Vergara et al 2010). We found that the number of eggs was best explained by the arrival date of the second stork at the nest, rather than by local weather or land cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, predation might not play such an important role for the population dynamics of such a large bird (cf. Djerdali et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations