2022
DOI: 10.1016/bs.hesagr.2022.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Waste: Farms, distributors, retailers, and households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the price is too low, a farmer may make a decision (which is completely right for him) not to harvest the crop and thus save the cost of harvesting, sorting, and transportation. It follows that striving for zero food loss is impractical [14].…”
Section: Food Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the price is too low, a farmer may make a decision (which is completely right for him) not to harvest the crop and thus save the cost of harvesting, sorting, and transportation. It follows that striving for zero food loss is impractical [14].…”
Section: Food Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a consumer encountering a stock-out tends to reduce expenditures in the affected category, skip purchases altogether even when close substitutes are available (Campo et al, 2003), and may even feel inclined to not patronize the retailer in the future (Fitzsimons, 2000). Thus, even in the face of uncertain demand and the risk of having unsold inventory requiring disposal, food retailers may seek full availability in important categories (Hamilton et al, 2022), and have been observed to make significant investments in reducing stock-outs in response to competitive pressures (Matsa, 2011). Stock-outs may, at times, be unavoidable as food retailers face an uncertain demand, even in the absence of the pandemic and its pursuant challenges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%