2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food-web complexity emerging from ecological dynamics on adaptive networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…May's findings had a remarkable impact on theoretical ecology, giving birth to the "complexity-stability debate" (McCann, 2000;Garcia-Domingo and Saldaña, 2007). This debate tries to reconcile the fact that empirical foodwebs span a wide range of values of S and C (see, e.g., the examples listed in (Dunne et al, 2002)) and thus appear not to be limited by an upper bound on the product S · C, with the results obtained by May.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…May's findings had a remarkable impact on theoretical ecology, giving birth to the "complexity-stability debate" (McCann, 2000;Garcia-Domingo and Saldaña, 2007). This debate tries to reconcile the fact that empirical foodwebs span a wide range of values of S and C (see, e.g., the examples listed in (Dunne et al, 2002)) and thus appear not to be limited by an upper bound on the product S · C, with the results obtained by May.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such robustness investigations are usually performed with more realistic food web structures than that of random webs, and they incorporate nonlinear population dynamics. In order to search for conditions under which robustness can remain large with increasing S · C, these investigations evaluate robustness either as function of S at fixed C, or as function of C at fixed S. However, even when the mentioned more realistic systems are used, the data typically show a negative complexity-stability relation, i.e., robustness decreases when either S or C is increased (Kondoh, 2003a;Garcia-Domingo and Saldaña, 2007;Kondoh, 2005;Uchida and Drossel, 2007). Recently, it was found that including foraging adaptation can lead to positive complexitystability relations when random or cascade topologies are used (Kondoh, 2003a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coevolutionary systems emerge in many different applications and have been studied in epidemic propagation [1,2], technical distribution networks [3,4], neural networks [5,6], models of social dynamics [7][8][9], game theory [10], ecological research models [11,12], chemical networks [13,14]. This paper proposes a microscopic model of wealth exchange between agents located on a dynamical network where the structure formation and wealth distribution are characterized and studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 13 we do not address at all direction of these relationships in this paper, we tested for robustness (or Here we show that the role of adaptive foraging is not that straightforward as the previous through the search image model on species persistence in complex food webs is highly sensitive 16 to parameter values (Fig. 2), the degree they vary among the species (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As it is difficult to deal with highly complex food webs, researchers have 13 sometimes lumped functionally similar species together (e.g., Yodzis and Winemiller 1999) 14 and/or thought of food webs as collections of simple building blocks, called community mod- 15 ules in ecology (Holt 1995) and motifs in the gene networks literature (e.g., Milo et al 2002). 16 Mathematical analysis of such community modules (including food chain, exploitative compe-17 tition, apparent competition, omnivory and others) is relatively straightforward and has revealed 18 important effects of their structure on population dynamics, through both direct and indirect in- 19 teractions (Holt 1995). This suggests that food web structure is one of the major determinants 20 of population dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%