2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2434847100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships

Abstract: The consequences of biodiversity loss for ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services have aroused considerable interest during the past decade. Recent work has focused mainly on the impact of species diversity within single trophic levels, both experimentally and theoretically. Experiments have usually showed increased plant biomass and productivity with increasing plant diversity. Changes in biodiversity, however, may affect ecosystem processes through trophic interactions among species as well. An importan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
321
4
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
21
321
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Here, we provide contrary evidence that diverse protists mixtures substantially reduced bacterial cell numbers ( Supplementary Figure 2). This is further supported by theory (Thebault andLoreau, 2003, 2006), suggesting that increasing generalist predator richness may have a greater effect on prey abundance than increasing specialist predator richness, as well as by field and laboratory studies (Gamfeldt et al, 2005;Byrnes et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2008) showing that higher consumer or predator biomass because of increasing richness concomitantly resulted in reduced prey biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The ways in which species interactions are organized within biological systems affect different aspects of ecological and evolutionary dynamics, from community stability [1,2] to ecosystem functioning [3] and coevolution [4]. Ecologists have made substantial efforts to describe the structure and understand the assembly of ecological communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an analysis of omnivory in large complex food webs, Williams & Martinez (2004) found most species were restricted to consumption of adjacent rather than disparate trophic levels. This type of structure results in linearized food webs that appear to be more likely to experience trophic cascades (Pace et al 1999;Schmitz et al 2000;Thibault & Loreau 2003) and have higher interaction strengths that can destabilize population dynamics (McCann et al 1998). However, the number of species within trophic levels increases much faster than the number of trophic levels as species are added to a community (Williams & Martinez 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%