2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40781-015-0042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foot-and-mouth disease: overview of motives of disease spread and efficacy of available vaccines

Abstract: Control and prevention of foot and mouth disease (FMD) by vaccination remains unsatisfactory in endemic countries. Indeed, consistent and new FMD epidemics in previously disease-free countries have precipitated the need for a worldwide control strategy. Outbreaks in vaccinated animals require that a new and safe vaccine be developed against foot and mouth virus (FMDV). FMDV can be eradicated worldwide based on previous scientific information about its spread using existing and modern control strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The universal primer pairs IF/IR and P1/P2-based RT-PCR along with sequence detection can be used in the primarily rapid detection of FMD in infected animals [ 18 ]. It was recorded to be very successful for the detection and confirmation of FMDV serotype directly from the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The universal primer pairs IF/IR and P1/P2-based RT-PCR along with sequence detection can be used in the primarily rapid detection of FMD in infected animals [ 18 ]. It was recorded to be very successful for the detection and confirmation of FMDV serotype directly from the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, animal movement and trade restrictions (4) in combination with inactivated vaccines formulated with adjuvants are still the most commonly used strategy in FMD enzootic regions (3) or in case of outbreaks in FMD-free countries. Although effective, current inactivated vaccines have several limitations: they provide serotype specific, short-lived immunity with the necessity of booster injection, have a limited shelf life, require expensive high-containment biosafety level 3 (BSL3) manufacturing facilities for production, and do not allow the differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) unless highly purified (2,3). Recently, an Ad5-FMDV vaccine that overcomes many of these shortcomings has been granted a conditional license for use in cattle in the United States in case of emergency (5).…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since FMD is highly contagious and spreads rapidly, control of FMD is very challenging and requires a combination of strategies including detection and elimination of infected animals (Bachrach 1968, Paton and others 2014). While early detection and culling of infected and susceptible animals on the infected premises are pivotal ways to eradicate FMD, vaccination has also been an effective measure to control the spread of FMD (Lombard and others 2007, Elnekave and others 2013, Naranjo and Cosivi 2013, Saeed and others 2015). Vaccinations of cloven‐hoofed animals with O1 Manisa have been implemented after a severe outbreak of FMD occurred in South Korea in 2010.…”
Section: Con† Trt1‡ Trt2§ Sementioning
confidence: 99%