2011
DOI: 10.1002/oa.1148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foot anomalies in the Late Neolithic/Chalcolithic population exhumed from the rock cut cave of São Paulo 2 (Almada, Portugal)

Abstract: The study of developmental abnormalities of the tarsal bones in a Portuguese Late Neolithic population was performed, as part of an ongoing research project that includes the evaluation of foot defects in Portuguese skeletal populations from Neolithic times to modern 20th century samples. Two accessory bones were found, calcaneum secundarium and os trigonum, and three non-osseous coalitions were detected, calcaneonavicular, cuboid-navicular and third metatarsal-third cuneiform. The newly presented frequencies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a relatively high frequency of tarsal coalition among some populations (Pfitzner, 1896; Rühli et al ., 2003), the non‐osseous form of coalition has received relatively little attention by physical anthropologists until recently, when there has been a notable increase in documented archaeological cases of CN and TC coalition (e.g. Silva, 2005; Darton, 2007; Hofmann et al ., 2010; Dinwiddy, 2009; Silva, 2010; Silva & Silva, 2010). The earlier lack of attention to these coalitions is understandable, given that the morphology of NOC lesions in dry bone is difficult to ascertain from radiographs and other imaging technologies, and that photographs or illustrations of dry bone specimens have only been published for a few types (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a relatively high frequency of tarsal coalition among some populations (Pfitzner, 1896; Rühli et al ., 2003), the non‐osseous form of coalition has received relatively little attention by physical anthropologists until recently, when there has been a notable increase in documented archaeological cases of CN and TC coalition (e.g. Silva, 2005; Darton, 2007; Hofmann et al ., 2010; Dinwiddy, 2009; Silva, 2010; Silva & Silva, 2010). The earlier lack of attention to these coalitions is understandable, given that the morphology of NOC lesions in dry bone is difficult to ascertain from radiographs and other imaging technologies, and that photographs or illustrations of dry bone specimens have only been published for a few types (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paleopathological studies, calcaneonavicular coalitions have been researched and described by Angel (1971), Stloukal and Vyhnánek (1976), Dastugue and Metz (1977), Cooperman et al (2001), Silva (2005;2011), Darton (2007, Dinwiddy (2009), Silva andSilva (2010) and Case and Burnett (2012). Most of them were case studies; only Cooperman et al (2001) and Case and Burnett (2012) recorded the frequency of tarsal coalition in whole skeletal collections.…”
Section: Iansa 2016 • Vii/1 • 31-32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of CS as described in the literature is uncertain, since it differs significantly depending on the type of study (radiologic or anatomic) [ 4 , 25 ] and on the population studied [ 25 - 27 ]. With a prevalence ranging from 0.14% up to 7% the CS is one of the more infrequently found accessory bones of the foot, which though should not be underestimated [ 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 12 , 15 , 16 , 26 , 28 - 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of CS may vary between different peoples. Silva, for example, reported on a Neolithic-Chalcolithic population in Almada, Portugal, in which an increased incidence of CS was found, namely 8.6% in left and 15.2% in right feet [ 27 ]. Although until now no heredity transmission has been proven, these findings raised a discussion about aspects such as geographic isolation and intermarriage in relation to the incidence of CS [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation