2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00037-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
4
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
107
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These slipping experiments indicated that a slip was likely to result in a fall if the sliding exceeded 0.1 m in distance or 0.5 m s −1 in velocity. A recent study by Brady et al (2000) suggested that foot displacement rather than the velocity of the slipping foot would predict the outcome of a slip, and that the threshold values for fall avoidance may be higher than previously thought. Roughly 75% of the subjects in these bare foot slipping experiments over an oily vinyl surface were able to recover balance, when the slip distance was 0.2 m and the slipping foot velocity was 1.1 m s −1 (cf.…”
Section: Biomechanically-oriented Approachesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These slipping experiments indicated that a slip was likely to result in a fall if the sliding exceeded 0.1 m in distance or 0.5 m s −1 in velocity. A recent study by Brady et al (2000) suggested that foot displacement rather than the velocity of the slipping foot would predict the outcome of a slip, and that the threshold values for fall avoidance may be higher than previously thought. Roughly 75% of the subjects in these bare foot slipping experiments over an oily vinyl surface were able to recover balance, when the slip distance was 0.2 m and the slipping foot velocity was 1.1 m s −1 (cf.…”
Section: Biomechanically-oriented Approachesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Obviously, an increasingly safer situation from the point of view of balance recovery would follow. On the contrary, if the critical values (s = 0.2 m and v = 1.1 m s −1 ) for slip distance and velocity suggested by Brady et al (2000) would be applied in this equation, then the minimum coefficient of friction in the interface would need to be about 0.3 for a fall recovery.…”
Section: Critical Slip Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To this purpose, quantitative kinematic measurements such as joint angular rotations, are generally accomplished by means of devices (i.e. markers or electrogoniometries) applied on the subject during the movement execution [3][4] [5]. These systems are particularly accurate and widely accepted by the medical community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%