2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1002702810929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Footprint Analysis For Measurements Over A Heterogeneous Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
103
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is based on a Lagrangian stochastic forward model providing two dimensional contributions of source areas (Rannik et al 2000). The resulting footprint for NamUBT (Fig.…”
Section: Coordinate Rotation and Footprint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is based on a Lagrangian stochastic forward model providing two dimensional contributions of source areas (Rannik et al 2000). The resulting footprint for NamUBT (Fig.…”
Section: Coordinate Rotation and Footprint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five warmseason sites were a Scots pine forest in Hyytiälä, Finland (61°51 ¢ N, 24°17 ¢ E; data from 1997; Rannik et al 2000) , an aspen forest in Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan, Canada (53°63 ¢ N, 106°20 ¢ W; data from 1996; Black et al 2000) , a mixed deciduous forest in Walker Branch Watershed in Tennessee, USA (35°58 ¢ N, 84°17 ¢ W; data from 1996; Wilson et al 2000) , a mixed hardwood forest in Massachusetts, USA (Harvard Forest, 42°32 ¢ N, 72°10 ¢ W; data from1992; Goulden et al 1996) , and a native tallgrass prairie in Okalahoma, USA (36°56 ¢ N, 96°41 ¢ W; data from 1997; Suyker and Verma 2001) . These five sites were also used in Gu et al (2003a) .…”
Section: Sites and Data Used In The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Kalevansuo site footprint functions for passive tracers released from the forest floor were calculated with the forward Lagrangian stochastic model as described by Rannik et al (2000Rannik et al ( , 2003. The model predicted the horizontal distribution of the surface sources of the flux measurements for three selected wind direction (WD) sectors (140 • < WD < 190 • , 190 • < WD < 240 • and 240 • < WD < 320 • ) and for two stability classes (near-neutral and unstable conditions, defined for values of |L| > 200 and −200 < L < 0 respectively, where L is the Obukhov length measured above canopy).…”
Section: Appendix B Footprint Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%