2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Footprinting SHAPE-eCLIP Reveals Transcriptome-wide Hydrogen Bonds at RNA-Protein Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the plethora of cellular processes affected by RNA structures, there are numerous contexts in which summarizing local structure is important. To name a few examples, one might wish to find structural domains and druggable pockets in viral genomes (29,33,65), quantify connections between mRNA structure and gene regulation (43,48,57,(66)(67)(68), identify transcriptome-wide where RNA is differentially affected by particular stimuli (32,69), or compare structure between conditions and/or logical regions of genomes (1,30,70). The most popular approach for quantifying structuredness relies on a combination of two metrics: local reactivity and local Shannon entropy.…”
Section: Summarizing Structuredness In Rnas From Hairpin Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the plethora of cellular processes affected by RNA structures, there are numerous contexts in which summarizing local structure is important. To name a few examples, one might wish to find structural domains and druggable pockets in viral genomes (29,33,65), quantify connections between mRNA structure and gene regulation (43,48,57,(66)(67)(68), identify transcriptome-wide where RNA is differentially affected by particular stimuli (32,69), or compare structure between conditions and/or logical regions of genomes (1,30,70). The most popular approach for quantifying structuredness relies on a combination of two metrics: local reactivity and local Shannon entropy.…”
Section: Summarizing Structuredness In Rnas From Hairpin Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures, as well as their ability to dynamically change between relevant configurations, are known to play central roles in almost every facet of cellular regulation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Understanding the structures of RNA is therefore important, which has led to an explosion of methods which probe (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), computationally predict (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), and interpret them in various contexts (1,5,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corley et al recently harnessed structure probing to detect RBP binding sites in an experiment called fSHAPE and applied it transcriptome-wide to human cell lines (34). The result of their work is a large set of data encompassing in vivo and in vitro icSHAPE reactivities and fSHAPE scores, the latter of which capture differential reactivity in the presence and absence of RBPs.…”
Section: Mining Structurome Data Reveals Strong Association Between Stem-loops and Rbp Binding Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has warranted the development of methods designed to accommodate the growing scale of SP data in deciphering the extensive regulatory functions of mRNA structures. Such methods are useful when seeking to inspect and quantify biologically relevant changes in the structurome-for instance, to detect structural changes between different cellular conditions (27)(28)(29)(30), inspect the structural context of relevant regions, such as splice sites, miRNA targets, or alternative polyadenylation sites (31)(32)(33), profile the degree of structure across different types of mRNA (33), or explore the interplay between the structurome and RNA-protein interactome (34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation