Footstrike patterns among novice runners wearing a conventional, neutral running shoe

Bertelsen, Michael Lejbach; Jensen, Jens Flø; Nielsen, Morten Hvidbjerg; Nielsen, Rasmus Oestergaard; Rasmussen, Sten

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.022

Cited by 49 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results are in good agreement with previous studies in terms of: the distribution of RFS-MFS-FFS runners at long-distance velocities [5][6][7][8]; the shift away from RFS towards MFS and FFS at velocities ≥5 m·s -1 [10,11]; and partially with the distribution of RFS-MFS-FFS runners at middle-distance velocities [9].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…[5]. Studies on long-distance runners of varying ability have reported that 75-99% RFS, 0-24% MFS, and the remaining 0-2% FFS [5][6][7][8]. Thus, the majority of long-distance runners RFS, while differences in the prevalence of MFS are most likely due to the subjective nature of the discrete classification method and, in particular, the difficulty in distinguishing between MFS and FFS (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

Forrester

Townend

2015

Gait & Posture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citation: FORRESTER, S.E. and TOWNEND, J., 2015. The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle -a curve-clustering approach. Gait and Posture, 41 (1), pp. 26 -32.Additional Information:• NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Gait and Posture. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Gait -1 -

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

Forrester

Townend

2015

Gait & Posture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, the role of demographic characteristics and behaviour on injury development has been investigated based on the same dataset. Results from these analyses have been presented elsewhere [6], [7], [19] and more papers are submitted for publication. Based on this, the results presented in the present paper should be considered as a sub-analysis without focus on injury aetiology.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Prospective Study on Time to Recovery in 254 Injured Novice Runners

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesDescribe the diagnoses and the time to recovery of running-related injuries in novice runners.DesignProspective cohort study on injured runners.MethodThis paper is a secondary data analysis of a 933-person cohort study (DANO-RUN) aimed at characterizing risk factors for injury in novice runners. Among those sustaining running-related injuries, the types of injuries and time to recovery is described in the present paper. All injured runners were diagnosed after a thorough clinical examination and then followed prospectively during their recovery. If they recovered completely from injury, time to recovery of each injury was registered.ResultsA total of 254 runners were injured. The proportion of runners diagnosed with medial tibial stress syndrome was 15%, 10% for patellofemoral pain, 9% for medial meniscal injury, 7% for Achilles tendinopathy and 5% for plantar fasciitis. Among the 220 runners (87%) recovering from their injury, the median time to recovery was 71 days (minimum = 9 days, maximum = 617 days).ConclusionsMedial tibial stress syndrome was the most common injury followed by patellofemoral pain, medial meniscal injury and Achilles tendinopathy. Half of the injured runners were unable to run 2×500 meters without pain after 10 weeks. Almost 5% of the injured runners received surgical treatment.

show abstract

“…On the basis of this, gender, previous running-related injuries, previous injuries not related to running and previous running experience were rejected as confounders. Since more than 95% all participants utilised a rear-foot strike,18 the foot strike pattern was also rejected as confounder. Age has previously been shown to influence the foot posture15 and age has been associated with the development of injury 19 20.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Footstrike patterns among novice runners wearing a conventional, neutral running shoe

Cited by 49 publications

References 3 publications

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach

A Prospective Study on Time to Recovery in 254 Injured Novice Runners

Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About