2017
DOI: 10.1145/3053332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FootStriker

Abstract: In running, knee-related injuries are very common. The main cause are high impact forces when striking the ground with the heel first. Mid- or forefoot running is generally known to reduce impact loads and to be a more efficient running style. In this paper, we introduce a wearable running assistant, consisting of an electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) device and an insole with force sensing resistors. It detects heel striking and actuates the calf muscles during the flight phase to control the foot angle befo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying low-intensity EMS was helpful for increasing the muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness (Miyamoto et al, 2016). In addition, EMS actuates the calf muscles of the swing foot during running to control the foot angle for coaching a better way of striking the ground (Hassan et al, 2017). However, since the actual physical movement is not detected by the EMS system, it is difficult to confirm automatically whether the muscle movement is what the instructor intends.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying low-intensity EMS was helpful for increasing the muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness (Miyamoto et al, 2016). In addition, EMS actuates the calf muscles of the swing foot during running to control the foot angle for coaching a better way of striking the ground (Hassan et al, 2017). However, since the actual physical movement is not detected by the EMS system, it is difficult to confirm automatically whether the muscle movement is what the instructor intends.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nylander et al [59] chose to use both auditory and visual feedback to raise the runners' movement awareness, while PaceGuard [25] successfully employed only audio to help maintain running cadence. Finally, Hassan et al [31] chose to provide no feedback but to electrically stimulate the users' muscles to achieve improved running posture. While there is no consensus on feedback modalities in work on running, in the case of swimming, where sensory deprivation is a key design constraint, visual feedback was strongly preferred [44].…”
Section: Feedback In Hci For Sportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hassib et al exploited EMS to remotely communicate emotional responses to other parties by actuating different parts of the body (e.g., extending arms in case of happiness) [23]. Hassan et al implemented FootStriker [22], which leveraged EMS in footwear to protect from knee-related injuries by adjusting the foot's pose while running. Pfeiffer et al proposed cruise control for pedestrians to steer users via EMS as they walk [45].…”
Section: Ems In Hcimentioning
confidence: 99%