2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
227
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
227
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Tiefenbeck et al (2013) utilised water consumption as a valid pro-environmental behaviour. Moreover, we adopted components from Catlin and Wang's (2012) study on paper usage to assess water consumption during a towel-washing task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tiefenbeck et al (2013) utilised water consumption as a valid pro-environmental behaviour. Moreover, we adopted components from Catlin and Wang's (2012) study on paper usage to assess water consumption during a towel-washing task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, Clot, Grolleau, and Ibanez (2014) found that when participants performed pro-environmental behaviours, their willingness to donate to an environmental charity would reduce. Tiefenbeck, Staake, Roth, and Sachs (2013) observed that people who reduced water consumption actually increased their electricity usage later. There was additional evidence of individuals being selectively pro-environmental, such as behaving pro-environmentally at home but less so while travelling (Barr, Shaw, Coles, & Prillwitz, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It could be the result of a moral licensing effect, if someone does "something good" (reduce their energy consumption patterns), they might then feel more justified in doing "something bad" (reduce their investment in efficiency), as they feel they have a moral license to do this. Empirical evidence of behavioural change in energy conservation campaigns has previously been ascribed to this effect (Tiefenbeck et al, 2013). In this case households who received information on their water consumption and reduced their usage, also increased their electricity consumption by 5.6 percent compared to a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As far as we are aware, this trade off between curtailment and efficiency behaviour has not been empirically demonstrated before, however other re-3 search has demonstrated perverse side effects between water and electricity usage in energy conservation campaigns (Tiefenbeck et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%