“…In addition to situating maps and critiquing their ideological underpinnings, some critical geographers have argued for examining the underlying assumptions in geographic information data and mapping – especially the continued reliance on dominant conceptions of space that render “a complex spatiality into abstract space” (Roth, 2009, p. 208). Instead, they encourage the cultivation of “more‐than‐Euclidean, nonabsolute spatial representations” (O’Sullivan et al, 2018, p. 130), playful “geographical imagination systems” (Bergmann & Lally, 2021, p. 26), and creative approaches to counter‐mapping (Roth, 2009). For one, Luke Bergmann (2016) calls for embracing “speculative data,” the multiple “potentialities” of data, in order to “offer approaches to reconstructing geographic information in which spaces are relational, matter is vibrant, and/or knowledge is situated” (p. 973).…”