“…Indeed, the discursive psychological (Potter, 1996) perspective allows me to analyze the discursive strategies that the politicians deploy in their anti-Muslim political discourse: first, its epistemological orientation, that is, the ways in which the politicians seek to construct their own statements as commonsensical, factual and credible; and second, its action-orientation, or the ways in which the accounts are constructed to achieve particular outcomes (Augoustinos, LeCouteur, & Soyland, 2002). The critical discursive perspective combines "micro" and "macro" perspectives on discourse, and takes into account both the constitutive role of discourse-how culturally available discourses enable and constrain individuals' social action, and its constructive role-how individuals use it in order to achieve particular social outcomes (Budds, Locke, & Burr, 2016). Accordingly, it allows me to explore the culturally available resources that the politicians utilize in their discourse, and how these discursive patterns enable certain subject positions (Davies & Harr e, 1990) that the politicians can claim or resist.…”