A Global History of Execution and the Criminal Corpse 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137444011_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘For the Benefit of Example’: Crime-Scene Executions in England, 1720–1830

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first of these is in some ways a reasonable elision since, as Poole has pointed out, it was common in some parts of the country for both execution and display to be carried out at the scene of crime. 46 However, by the eighteenth century it was more usual for the condemned to be executed at a customary place of execution, often a permanent gallows erected in a prominent urban location, and then removed for enclosure in irons and transportation to a specified place near the scene of the crime for gibbeting. The confusion between gallows or scaffold on one hand, and gibbets on the other is only one popular confusion about the nature of post-execution punishment in Britain.…”
Section: As a Successful Or A Failed Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these is in some ways a reasonable elision since, as Poole has pointed out, it was common in some parts of the country for both execution and display to be carried out at the scene of crime. 46 However, by the eighteenth century it was more usual for the condemned to be executed at a customary place of execution, often a permanent gallows erected in a prominent urban location, and then removed for enclosure in irons and transportation to a specified place near the scene of the crime for gibbeting. The confusion between gallows or scaffold on one hand, and gibbets on the other is only one popular confusion about the nature of post-execution punishment in Britain.…”
Section: As a Successful Or A Failed Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Poole demonstrated that the standardisation of execution practices in England after 1783 was by no means driven by one central policy and that the processional culture persisted for some time thereafter, even on the doorstep of the capital. 43 Furthermore, from a reading of reports detailing crime scene executions in the early nineteenth century, it is evident that, rather than solely being a necessary part of the execution, the procession was a focal part of the whole spectacle and the desire for more severity in the face of increased levels of capital punishment outweighed more modern concerns for efficiency. For example, when John Henderson was executed in Cupar in 1830, 15,000 people travelled from all over the county of Fife for the event.…”
Section: Staging the Public Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the mechanism of massacres through space and time, a common de nition must be formulated to provide for a solid working ground. The two editors of the volume do specify in the Introduction the de nition which they deem the most appropriate, 2 and it is, interestingly, towards this de nition that all the chapters of the volume lean.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, authorities o en struggled with the details, balancing contemporary views about crime and punishment with the practicality of the logistics of executions and with their perceived need for optimum visibility and e ect. 2 Speci cally, location was deemed important; considerations included the city limits, how to enhance dramatic impression, how to ensure su cient space for onlookers and the symbolic meanings of the location. 3 In nineteenth-century colonial areas too, the assertion of state power was a motivator in the administration of the death penalty, as chie y illustrated in Chapters 6 and 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%