2019
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For the Benefit of Mr. Thompson: Organizations, Uncertainty, and Administrative Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when PAR selected its half-century's "Great Books" in public administration for its own 50th anniversary, Administrative Behavior was selected as the overwhelming winner by a panel of 20 experts (Sherwood 1990). The recent resurgence in interest in the behavioral sciences in public administration has reintroduced the book to a new audience (Battaglio and Hall 2019).…”
Section: Guest Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when PAR selected its half-century's "Great Books" in public administration for its own 50th anniversary, Administrative Behavior was selected as the overwhelming winner by a panel of 20 experts (Sherwood 1990). The recent resurgence in interest in the behavioral sciences in public administration has reintroduced the book to a new audience (Battaglio and Hall 2019).…”
Section: Guest Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the organization, institutional elements such as organizational structure, process, and procedure exist before the problem, or task shock, appears (Simon, 1997). At the institutional environment level, the organizational‐institutional structure will affect the distribution of power, the learning process, the incentive structure, and the institutional toolkits, thereby affecting the organizational decision‐making and adaptation process and capacity (Battaglio & Hall, 2019). The organization‐institution constituted by internal rules and institutional environments can channel, create, and manage turbulence (Ansell, Levi‐Faur, & Trondal, 2017; Trondal, 2022).…”
Section: Analytic Framework: the Institutional Process Of Organizatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How should managers balance urgency with accountability? Urgency increases complexity and uncertainty, which is a recipe for decreased rational analysis (Battaglio and Hall 2019a). As System I thinking dominates rapid‐fire, gut‐driven, managerial decisions to the exclusion of deliberate rational thinking characterized by System II, the potential for bias to influence outcomes will increase.…”
Section: Framing the Crisis: Questions For Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%