2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0020743812001274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“For the Fatherland and the State”: Armenians Negotiate the Tanzimat Reforms

Abstract: This article examines Ottoman Armenian attitudes toward the Tanzimat reforms, particularly in relation to the situation of provincial Armenians. Even though implementation of the reforms was slow and marked by setbacks, the promises embedded in them raised expectations of change among Armenians in both Istanbul and the provinces. In response, individuals in these areas equipped themselves with knowledge of the language and principles of the Tanzimat. They interpreted and utilized these for their own purposes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 From the 1860s onward, provincial Armenians' complaints to the authorities intensified: they claimed they were forced to pay taxes twice-once to the central government and later to their Kurdish landlords; they reported that many of them were being reduced to tenancy on their own land by predatory lending and outright force; they complained many official posts remained closed to them despite promises to the contrary. 29 As peasant grievances mounted, the Armenian National Assembly submitted reports to the Ottoman government to address them. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, these grievances had reached imperial and international audiences, constituting a central component of the aforementioned Armenian Question.…”
Section: Faces Of Reform and The Making Of The Armenian Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 From the 1860s onward, provincial Armenians' complaints to the authorities intensified: they claimed they were forced to pay taxes twice-once to the central government and later to their Kurdish landlords; they reported that many of them were being reduced to tenancy on their own land by predatory lending and outright force; they complained many official posts remained closed to them despite promises to the contrary. 29 As peasant grievances mounted, the Armenian National Assembly submitted reports to the Ottoman government to address them. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, these grievances had reached imperial and international audiences, constituting a central component of the aforementioned Armenian Question.…”
Section: Faces Of Reform and The Making Of The Armenian Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line of supporters standing shoulder to shoulder with CCP leaders on Tian'anmen Gate embodied the promise of political stability and an inclusive government. 1 Among them were eminent figures such as Shen Junru 沈鈞儒 (1875, Zhang Lan 張瀾 (1872-1955), Song Qingling 宋慶齡 (1893-1981, and Li Jishen 李濟深 (1885-1959 as representatives of several left-leaning smaller parties and associations that had formed during the Republican period . Under the direction of the CCP's United Front Work Department (tongzhanbu 統戰部), they had laid the groundwork for the convening of a new political body, the Chinese People's Consultative Conference (CPPCC), in September 1949.…”
Section: Notes Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 More recently, scholars have turned their attention to how Ottoman subjects responded to and negotiated the reforms. 15 This article takes inspiration from this revisionist literature in considering how the Süryani reacted to the Tanzimat reforms. It furthers this literature not simply by examining a particular feature of the Tanzimat bureaucracy-concern with the documentary record-but also by demonstrating how this documentary sensibility precipitated a reformulation of Süryani communal identity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%