2011
DOI: 10.3109/17477166.2011.566440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For whom and under what circumstances do school-based energy balance behavior interventions work? Systematic review on moderators

Abstract: The aim of this review was to systematically review the results and quality of studies investigating the moderators of school-based interventions aimed at energy balance-related behaviors. We systematically searched the electronic databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo, ERIC and Sportdiscus. In total 61 articles were included. Gender, ethnicity, age, baseline values of outcomes, initial weight status and socioeconomic status were the most frequently studied potential moderators. The moderator with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
104
3
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
6
104
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…From the point of increased PA and decreased % of overweight/obesity in follow-up measurement, the intervention girls achieved better results than the intervention boys. This finding is supported by the main conclusions of a systematic review of moderators of 61 school-based interventions [35], which claims that female gender is one of the most positive moderators of the intervention effects. Unfortunately, the average school day step counts of control and intervention children at follow-up (September 2010) was lower when compared with step counts of 6- to 12-year-old girls (10,800–14,800) and boys (11,500–18,100) from Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Great Britain, Japan and the United States of America [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…From the point of increased PA and decreased % of overweight/obesity in follow-up measurement, the intervention girls achieved better results than the intervention boys. This finding is supported by the main conclusions of a systematic review of moderators of 61 school-based interventions [35], which claims that female gender is one of the most positive moderators of the intervention effects. Unfortunately, the average school day step counts of control and intervention children at follow-up (September 2010) was lower when compared with step counts of 6- to 12-year-old girls (10,800–14,800) and boys (11,500–18,100) from Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Great Britain, Japan and the United States of America [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…To our knowledge, no mediators and moderators of child and adolescent treatment outcome have specifically been identified, and this is a limitation of the field (Yildirim et al, 2011). Identifying predictors of treatment response is important in understanding the factors that contribute to success in existing treatments in order to identify who may benefit most from treatment and guide future treatment modifications or delivery to maximize effectiveness (Goldschmidt et al, 2014).…”
Section: Predictors Mediators and Moderators Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there have been no studies examining predictors of outcome following MT. Moreover, there is an incomplete understanding of patient moderating variables predicting response among different approaches with demonstrated average efficacy across children (Epstein et al, 2012; Yildirim et al, 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%