2004
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.113896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage growth and nutrient cycle of aspen forest communities in Alberta's lower foothills subregion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As heavy grazing continued and became severe, they found that native plant species declined in cover and were replaced by Kentucky bluegrass, dandelion and clover species, to form the Aspen/Kentucky bluegrass/Clover community t)q)e. The species composition changes caused by increased grazing pressure severely affects the plant community's ability to create primary production. Willoughby and Lane (2004) found that forage growth and production was 25-40% lower in the Aspen/Rose/Clover community compared to the Aspen/Rose/Tall forb community and in this study there was over a 54% drop in forage production between the Aspen/Rose-Low bush cranberry/Tall forb and Aspen/Rose/Clover community t}q)es. Maintaining these aspen dominated communities at higher ecological status scores maintains plant species diversity and forage production creating a stable community that will sustain livestock, wildlife and timber production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…As heavy grazing continued and became severe, they found that native plant species declined in cover and were replaced by Kentucky bluegrass, dandelion and clover species, to form the Aspen/Kentucky bluegrass/Clover community t)q)e. The species composition changes caused by increased grazing pressure severely affects the plant community's ability to create primary production. Willoughby and Lane (2004) found that forage growth and production was 25-40% lower in the Aspen/Rose/Clover community compared to the Aspen/Rose/Tall forb community and in this study there was over a 54% drop in forage production between the Aspen/Rose-Low bush cranberry/Tall forb and Aspen/Rose/Clover community t}q)es. Maintaining these aspen dominated communities at higher ecological status scores maintains plant species diversity and forage production creating a stable community that will sustain livestock, wildlife and timber production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Crude protein content is an important variable for evaluating forage quality. Other studies have reported a >8% crude protein content (Table 1) during the growing season, as in this study, in common forage species such as Calamagrostis canadensis, Leymus innovatus (hairy wild rye), and Chamerion angustifolium, with subsequently lower values during the non-growing season ($5% content - Johnston and Bezeau, 1961;Corns and Schraa, 1962;Prescott et al, 1989;Larter and Gates, 1991;Willoughby and Lane, 2004). The ability of bison to digest high fiber, low crude protein forage (Peden et al, 1974;Hawley, 1987) may help to compensate for the poor quality of nongrowing season forage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%