2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2001.00514.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage Quality Components in Grazing‐Type Lucerne (Medicago sativa L. complex)

Abstract: Much is now known about the morphological attributes of the lucerne plant that contribute to improved tolerance to grazing. With the aim of developing grazing‐tolerant varieties, a range of genotypes were preliminarily selected for the presence of desirable attributes, and categorized into four morphological models based on their top‐growth morphology and vigour. Little is known about the implications for forage quality of selection of non‐conventional, grazing‐type lucerne. This investigation was undertaken t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with the beginning of flowering, harvesting time has a positive, significant influence at the 0.01 probability level (Table 1). The results of this study had similar trend with the conclusions of Alibés et al (1991), Layug et al (1996), , Pecetti et al (2001), Rimi et al (2010), Shroyer et al (1984), in studies conducted on the influence of the harvesting time on plant height.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Starting with the beginning of flowering, harvesting time has a positive, significant influence at the 0.01 probability level (Table 1). The results of this study had similar trend with the conclusions of Alibés et al (1991), Layug et al (1996), , Pecetti et al (2001), Rimi et al (2010), Shroyer et al (1984), in studies conducted on the influence of the harvesting time on plant height.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, recently selected varieties have shown some potential with respect to this aspect (Wang et al. , 1996a; Pecetti et al. , 2001).…”
Section: Temperate Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither red clover (T. pratense, L.) nor lucerne is considered suitable for repeated grazing, because of low persistence and slow recovery of damaged plant parts. However, recently selected varieties have shown some potential with respect to this aspect (Wang et al, 1996a;Pecetti et al, 2001). For lotus (Lotus corniculatus, L. and L. pedunculatus, Cav) or Caucasian (Kura) clover (T. ambiguum, M. Bieb), there have been few investigations in Europe on their suitability for grazing and there are several unsolved questions concerning the integration of these species into grassland systems (Abberton et al, 1998;Paul et al, 2002;Seguin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Temperate Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996), and this accounts for the low number of plants of this kind used in this investigation. Although an environmental effect on the observed differences in morphology among models could not be excluded, later evaluation of the replicated, clonal progenies of each selected genotype in a randomized complete block design (nine cuttings per plot) confirmed the presence of these differences for characters, such as plant height, vigour, and spreading ability, as well as forage quality features (Pecetti et al. 2001), thus corroborating an actual genetic bearing of the differentiation among morphological patterns.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 76%