2001
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151449x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage Yield and Quality of Corn Cultivars Developed in Different Eras

Abstract: Gains in corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield over time are well documented, but corresponding changes in forage and stover yield and quality have received less attention. Our objective was to describe yield and quality changes of representative cultivars used by farmers in the northern Corn Belt. Six open‐pollinated cultivars used prior to 1930, 24 cultivars representing four 15‐yr eras between 1931 and 1990, and six modern cultivars, for a total of 36 cultivars, were divided into early‐ and late‐maturity trials. E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
93
1
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
93
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation exists for cell wall composition and digestibility traits at both the silage stage (approximately reproductive 3 (R3)) [16,27,28,43] and physiological maturity (reproductive 6 (R6)) [27,28]. It has also been shown that breeding for forage yield and quality (cell wall composition and digestibility) has increased milk yields on both a per unit land and per unit mass basis [23]. Similarly, increasing the quality of maize stover for use as a biofeedstock through breeding and selection will have an impact in the efficiency of producing biofuels from cellulosic materials on both a per hectare and per ton basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation exists for cell wall composition and digestibility traits at both the silage stage (approximately reproductive 3 (R3)) [16,27,28,43] and physiological maturity (reproductive 6 (R6)) [27,28]. It has also been shown that breeding for forage yield and quality (cell wall composition and digestibility) has increased milk yields on both a per unit land and per unit mass basis [23]. Similarly, increasing the quality of maize stover for use as a biofeedstock through breeding and selection will have an impact in the efficiency of producing biofuels from cellulosic materials on both a per hectare and per ton basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among available tropical forages corn silage is widely used on dairy farms with high production per cow and is frequently taken as the one with the highest nutritive value (Nussio et al, 2003). The higher nutritive value of corn silage is dependent on the percentage of grain in the total mass (Schmid et al, 1976;Lauer et al, 2001). However, Deinum & Bakker (1981) and Coors & Lauer (2000) have demonstrated that as grain percentage increases, stover digestibility decreases, so that there is no strong relationship between grain percentage and total forage dry matter digestibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cultivars had a lower DT than that recorded by Bosch et al (1992) (Table 5). Wong et al (2006) and Lauer et al (2001) concluded that fresh and dry weights of corn with husks (MVE or MSE) and stems (MVT or MST) are the two major components of the total dry matter and green. In this context breeding for the formation of new forage cultivars should focus on obtaining more MVE materials, MSE, MVT, and MST, as a prerequisite for increased production of total dry matter.…”
Section: Cuadro 4 Comparación De Medias Para Producción De Forraje Dmentioning
confidence: 99%