1991
DOI: 10.2307/3809516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging Behavior by Mule Deer: The Influence of Cattle Grazing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the ecological impacts of livestock grazing on wildlife conservation objectives, as well as the social dynamics that influence stocking densities and herding behaviour, are poorly understood but strongly debated (Saberwal, 1996(Saberwal, , 1998Mishra & Rawat, 1998). The issue of forage competition between livestock and wild herbivores, although long acknowledged as being important for conservation management (Kie et al, 1991), has remained a contentious one and reviews suggest a worldwide scarcity of studies aimed at understanding it (Putman, 1996;Prins, 2000). In this paper, we evaluate the effects of livestock grazing on the conservation status of a mountain ungulate in the Trans-Himalayan cold deserts of India in the context of current social dynamics in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the ecological impacts of livestock grazing on wildlife conservation objectives, as well as the social dynamics that influence stocking densities and herding behaviour, are poorly understood but strongly debated (Saberwal, 1996(Saberwal, , 1998Mishra & Rawat, 1998). The issue of forage competition between livestock and wild herbivores, although long acknowledged as being important for conservation management (Kie et al, 1991), has remained a contentious one and reviews suggest a worldwide scarcity of studies aimed at understanding it (Putman, 1996;Prins, 2000). In this paper, we evaluate the effects of livestock grazing on the conservation status of a mountain ungulate in the Trans-Himalayan cold deserts of India in the context of current social dynamics in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative impacts of cattle grazing have been reported for mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus (Rafinesque, 1817)) (Kie et al 1991), bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) (Brown et al 2010), ground-nesting birds (Fondell and Ball 2004), odonates (Foote and Hornung 2005), and rodent species associated with habitats with substantial ground cover (hispid pocket mouse (Chaetodipus hispidus (Baird, 1858)), western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis (Baird, 1858)), white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818)), and hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus Say and Ord, 1825); Bock et al 1984). Conversely, some studies described positive effects of cattle grazing in small mammals preferring open habitats (e.g., Merriam's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami Mearns, 1890), which are abundant on grazed sites; Bock et al 1984), while one study (Bakker et al 2009) showed different reactions to cattle grazing by different species: rather positive for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus (L., 1758)) and negative for common voles (Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of domestic livestock can adversely affect the spatial distribution, activity budgets and/or 45 the diets of wild ungulates (Kie 1996;Kie et al 1991;Loft et al 1991;Putman 1996). This competition for space and food may also have consequences for reproductive success, and long-term population dynamics (Forsyth 2000;Forsyth and Hickling 1998;Madhusudan 2004;Mishra et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%