1970
DOI: 10.1093/jee/63.3.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging Behavior of the Argentine Ant in a California Citrus Grove1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
67
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite L. humile having been described as an aggressive and very disruptive ant species for biological control (Markin, 1970), in our study we found no significant effects on the community structure of natural enemies. The same can be deduced for the native to the Mediterranean species in our study, L. grandis and P. pallidula.…”
Section: Species Richness Diversity and Community Structure Of Predacontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Despite L. humile having been described as an aggressive and very disruptive ant species for biological control (Markin, 1970), in our study we found no significant effects on the community structure of natural enemies. The same can be deduced for the native to the Mediterranean species in our study, L. grandis and P. pallidula.…”
Section: Species Richness Diversity and Community Structure Of Predacontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Incomplete dietary information greatly hinders an understanding of the community-wide effects of ant invasions. Invasive ants forage extensively on liquids (11,14,15), so observational data on diets are of limited use, because the exact composition of consumed or stored liquids remains unknown (e.g., the relative proportions of nectar, honeydew, and hemolymph). For these reasons, we use stable isotope analysis, an approach of demonstrated value in quantifying trophic relationships in ants (13,16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phorid that attacks A. cephalotes waits beside conspicuous colony entrances for ants to emerge, which makes it difficult for vulnerable castes of A. cephalotes to leave the nest without encountering parasitoids. In contrast to A. cephalotes, Linepithema tend to make shallow, mobile nests with widely scattered, often hidden colony entrances (Markin, 1970). This difference in nest ecology means that Linepithema workers may be less likely than Atta workers to be pinned underground by phorids stationed beside a nest entrance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%